| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rikz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 103
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enzobelmont
Guru
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Location: Chiapas, Mexico
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:15 am Post subject: |
 |
|
rebuilding again phonon part compiled fine....
U phonon/globalstatic_p.h --->this file was the cause. updated throgh SVN
kdelibs still compiling.
_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano... Gentoo laetificat cor hominis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mikkoc
Apprentice
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 204
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tranquilcool wrote: | | after latest svn update, icons on the desktop and panel do not respond to mouse clicks. |
I can confirm this with today's svn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LXj
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Rikz, seems like you're right, it compiles now. I hope I will have KDE4 in the morning, or readers of my blog will start laughing at me (and btw, I don't believe that your e-mail is gates-at-ms-dot-com)  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rikz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| LXj wrote: | | Thanks, Rikz, seems like you're right, it compiles now. I hope I will have KDE4 in the morning, or readers of my blog will start laughing at me (and btw, I don't believe that your e-mail is gates-at-ms-dot-com) |
Here's a good link: http://developer.kde.org/~dirk/dashboard/ it can help you with problems like "foo is not compiling". If some revision is really broken, that automatic system knows about it. It means that fix will be ready soon.
PS: it is a really complicated thing to comment something in your blog. As my Yandex OpenID account still doesn't work and I'm too lazy to fill all the needed fields in the form  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzobelmont
Guru
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Location: Chiapas, Mexico
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
can amarok2 and amarok 1.4.8 be installed at same time or 2-svn will upgrade the old one??
_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano... Gentoo laetificat cor hominis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wrc1944
Veteran
Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2063
Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tranquilcool wrote: | Quote: | | after latest svn update, icons on the desktop and panel do not respond to mouse clicks. |
I have the same problem. Tried removing .kdesvn while booted to konsole login- didn't work.
Removing all the icons and re-creating them on either desktop or panel doesn't work either. However, since all the menu items that I'm trying to place on the desktop work/launch normally from the menu, it would seem to be isolated to a desktop/plasma problem- correct?
Is there something else to try I've overlooked?
This also has happened on my Arch Linux kde-svn installation, so it doesn't appear to be Gentoo related. Can others confirm this, and it's a current svn problem, and we just need to wait for a fix?
I haven't rebuilt qt-4.3.3 in a while- is this recommended with every svn update, or is that unnecessary? I'm running current ~x86.
Another thought: Are we getting close to having to go to qt-4.4, as was mentioned previously somewhere- forget exactly where?
Or is that actually going to be when kde-4.1 is actually released?
_________________
Main box- ASRock790GX/128M AM2+ (AM3 ready)
AMD X2 5050e, 2.6 GHz, 8GB GSkill-PC6400 DDR2 800
Seagate SATA 250GB, radeon hd 3300 IGP
Gentoo ~amd64, glibc-2.9, gcc-4.3.3, kde-testing |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LXj
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Is there something else to try I've overlooked? |
It seems like a fresh new bug, which we should wait a fix for. It's SVN, remember? Good thing would be to report it to KDE Bugzilla or to vote for it if it's already reported |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drizzt
Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Icons"-Problem fixed.
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to loose my respect... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rikz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did someone successfully emerged kdevelop-9999.4? I have a trouble with it:
| Code: | [ 95%] Building CXX object languages/cpp/cppduchain/CMakeFiles/kdev4cppduchain.dir/name_visitor.o
/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/kdevelop-9999.4/work/kdevelop-9999.4/languages/cpp/cppduchain/name_visitor.cpp:83:2: warning: #warning "NameASTVisitor::visitUnqualifiedName() -- implement me"
/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/kdevelop-9999.4/work/kdevelop-9999.4/languages/cpp/cppduchain/name_visitor.cpp: In member function 'virtual void NameASTVisitor::visitUnqualifiedName(UnqualifiedNameAST*)':
/var/tmp/portage/dev-util/kdevelop-9999.4/work/kdevelop-9999.4/languages/cpp/cppduchain/name_visitor.cpp:112: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'kDebug(int)().QDebug::operator<<(((const char*)"failed to find ")) << ((NameASTVisitor*)this)->NameASTVisitor::m_currentIdentifier'
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qdebug.h:84: note: candidates are: QDebug& QDebug::operator<<(QChar)
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qdebug.h:85: note: QDebug& QDebug::operator<<(bool)
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qdebug.h:86: note: QDebug& QDebug::operator<<(char)
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qdebug.h:87: note: QDebug& QDebug::operator<<(short int)
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qdebug.h:88: note: QDebug& QDebug::operator<<(short unsigned int)
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qdebug.h:89: note: QDebug& QDebug::operator<<(int)
|
I skipped multiple lines here, full log is located here: http://pastebin.com/m678a997b
And here's the end of the error message:
| Code: |
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qbytearray.h:527: note: QDataStream& operator<<(QDataStream&, const QByteArray&)
/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qchar.h:358: note: QDataStream& operator<<(QDataStream&, const QChar&)
make[2]: *** [languages/cpp/cppduchain/CMakeFiles/kdev4cppduchain.dir/name_visitor.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [languages/cpp/cppduchain/CMakeFiles/kdev4cppduchain.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wrc1944
Veteran
Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2063
Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Icon fix confirmed here on Arch Linux- Just compiled r774553, and that fixed it.  I did Arch first as it only takes about an hour, as the official kde kdesvn-build script I use on Arch only does the parts that have actually changed. Does that script posted here on page 5 actually do that now? I previously tried a script for Gentoo, but it still compiled ALL of the package (s), and took the usual 7-8 hours for a complete emerge recompile.
On to recompile my Gentoo installations.
_________________
Main box- ASRock790GX/128M AM2+ (AM3 ready)
AMD X2 5050e, 2.6 GHz, 8GB GSkill-PC6400 DDR2 800
Seagate SATA 250GB, radeon hd 3300 IGP
Gentoo ~amd64, glibc-2.9, gcc-4.3.3, kde-testing |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
g2g591
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I get that same kdevelop error, however, i talked with some of the kdevelop devs on irc, and it works for them, so I have no idea why it doesn't work with us Gentoo users. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drizzt
Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I encountered the same error in kdevelop-9999.4.
Maybe the "debug" use flag is necessary ? (Just a shot...)
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to loose my respect... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rikz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| drizzt wrote: | I encountered the same error in kdevelop-9999.4.
Maybe the "debug" use flag is necessary ? (Just a shot...) |
kdevelop ebuild doesn't have "debug" use flag:
| Code: | # emerge -p kdevelop
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N ] dev-util/kdevelop-9999.4 0 kB [1]
Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 0 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
[0] /usr/portage
[1] /usr/portage/local/layman/kde
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fldc2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Location: Motala, Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wrc1944 wrote: | tranquilcool wrote: | Quote: | | after latest svn update, icons on the desktop and panel do not respond to mouse clicks. |
Another thought: Are we getting close to having to go to qt-4.4, as was mentioned previously somewhere- forget exactly where?
Or is that actually going to be when kde-4.1 is actually released? |
qt-copy in trunk is now 4.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drizzt
Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe this qt-version is the answer to the compile problems of kdevelop...
So this raises a few questions:
a) Is qt-copy slotted ?
b) Is there an ebuild ?
c) Where and how to get ?
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to loose my respect... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rikz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| drizzt wrote: | maybe this qt-version is the answer to the compile problems of kdevelop...
So this raises a few questions:
a) Is qt-copy slotted ?
b) Is there an ebuild ?
c) Where and how to get ? |
a) I think not, but I'm not sure
b) yes
c) there was a link in some of older forum threads about KDE4 overlay |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wrc1944
Veteran
Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2063
Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I first tried to install kde4 on PCLOS and Arch Linux a few weeks ago, I used the kdesvn-build script, which by default uses qt-copy. and "kdesupport" packages. I'm not sure if it was qt-4.4, or not- I didn't check at the time.
I had problems with that, especially PCLOS, which I subsequently abandoned. With Arch, I decided to use their qt-4.3.3 and all their other kde4 dep support packages, which so far is working out well. All I had to do was comment out qt-copy and kde-support in the kdesvn-build's .kdesvnrc file. So far, no compiling problems except due to svn package problems which are soon corrected.
With Gentoo, I've been using the Gentoo kde overlay, and the qt version in ~x86 portage. I'm assuming the kde devs will make an annoucement when we need to go to qt4.4, and Gentoo will slot it, and/or we'll need it in the overlay.
_________________
Main box- ASRock790GX/128M AM2+ (AM3 ready)
AMD X2 5050e, 2.6 GHz, 8GB GSkill-PC6400 DDR2 800
Seagate SATA 250GB, radeon hd 3300 IGP
Gentoo ~amd64, glibc-2.9, gcc-4.3.3, kde-testing |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StifflerStealth
l33t
Joined: 03 Jul 2002
Posts: 929
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fldc2 wrote: | | qt-copy in trunk is now 4.4 |
Thanks for the info. I need to update that. I guess, I should do that today. XD I will check for other updates as well.
To the person wondering about qt-copy ... check my sig. I have had no qt-copy related issues so far. In fact, I reported some things work better with it. It's mainly bug fixes for the 4.x line of Qt, the 3.x line had tons of feature improvements.
_________________
Nothing to read in this sig. Move along. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drizzt
Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thnx for the info. I'm recompiling qt3/4 right now
Maybe adding the ebuilds (et least for qt4) to this kde4 overlay ? *g*
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to loose my respect... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzobelmont
Guru
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Location: Chiapas, Mexico
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
raptor has its own page now! http://raptor-menu.org
is this working for somebody??
it just shows a panel with two icons (apps and documents i think), no more.
it sits and does nothing.
any experiences with raptor?
_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano... Gentoo laetificat cor hominis |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ingmarv
Retired Dev
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 188
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| drizzt wrote: | Thnx for the info. I'm recompiling qt3/4 right now
Maybe adding the ebuilds (et least for qt4) to this kde4 overlay ? *g* |
It's been suggested before (search the archives if you're interested), it's not going to happen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drizzt
Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ingmarv wrote: | | drizzt wrote: | Thnx for the info. I'm recompiling qt3/4 right now
Maybe adding the ebuilds (et least for qt4) to this kde4 overlay ? *g* |
It's been suggested before (search the archives if you're interested), it's not going to happen. |
Was just an idea..
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to loose my respect... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StifflerStealth
l33t
Joined: 03 Jul 2002
Posts: 929
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep. qt-copy will not be in the overlay.  Well, unless the KDE Devs decide to make it mandatory, then they will throw test ebuilds in there, but not until then. There was talk on IRC again today between some devs questioning if qt-copy should be made mandatory. The topic is open ended. If you want it to be made mandatory, talk to the KDE Devs (not gentoo ones) with your views. I won't.
I tested new Qt Copy patches for 3.3.8, and right now I am compiling new 4.3.3 Qt Copy patches. I will test the 4.4 ones after that. There were a couple of bugs that I found and reported to Drik and they got fixed, which is why it's taking so long to get new Qt Copy ebuilds out.
_________________
Nothing to read in this sig. Move along. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
drizzt
Apprentice
Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 248
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah ok, there is a misunderstanding...
I meant if qt-4.4 and /or qt-copy will be added to the overlay if it is needed for proper compiling....
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to loose my respect... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
