View previous topic :: View next topic |
do you prefer grub or lilo? |
lilo |
|
18% |
[ 8 ] |
grub |
|
81% |
[ 36 ] |
|
Total Votes : 44 |
|
Author |
Message |
eleKtron Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Jun 2003 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:10 pm Post subject: grub vs lilo! |
|
|
I'm personally a lilo fan. grub is just a pain to me.... lilo is so easy to set up and it gets the job done quite nicely....
I'm just curious about everyone elses thoughts on this... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Senso Apprentice
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Posts: 250 Location: Montreal, Quebec
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even if grub is usually recommended, I've never had any problem with lilo. I've OpenBSD & Gentoo partitions, plus one or two test kernels and it's all well. Why change when it ain't broke? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
charlieg Advocate
Joined: 30 Jul 2002 Posts: 2149 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use grub.
However, I wish it supported the pingus theme that Lilo does... _________________ Want Free games?
Free Gamer - open source games list & commentary
Open source web-enabled rich UI platform: Vexi |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lovechild Advocate
Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 2858 Location: Århus, Denmark
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GRUB is all that's allowed on my MBR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scriptkiddie l33t
Joined: 30 Mar 2003 Posts: 955
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like grub because you can make it extremely nice looking.. but it never finds all my hard drives.
I use LILO on all my PC's now |
|
Back to top |
|
|
idl Retired Dev
Joined: 24 Dec 2002 Posts: 1728 Location: Nottingham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer grub, because with lilo I always forget to run lilo before I reboot to my new kernel... and I change kernels often
Last edited by idl on Tue Aug 12, 2003 3:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Senso Apprentice
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Posts: 250 Location: Montreal, Quebec
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
port001 wrote: | I prefer grub, because will lilo I always forget to run lilo before I reboot to my new kernel... and I change kernels often |
Ooooh so true, that happened to me a lot. I didn't know grub didn't need that, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
idl Retired Dev
Joined: 24 Dec 2002 Posts: 1728 Location: Nottingham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Senso wrote: | port001 wrote: | I prefer grub, because will lilo I always forget to run lilo before I reboot to my new kernel... and I change kernels often |
Ooooh so true, that happened to me a lot. I didn't know grub didn't need that, though. |
lilo writes its config to the MBR, grub writes its config location to the MBR. Grub works out from the config what kernel to boot, and configures itself accordingly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Senso Apprentice
Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Posts: 250 Location: Montreal, Quebec
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
port001 wrote: |
lilo writes its config to the MBR, grub writes its config location to the MBR. Grub works out from the config what kernel to boot, and configures itself accordingly. |
So basically, since grub doesn't write itself to the MBR, does that means Windows doesn't try to rewrite the MBR, like it did with lilo when I was dual-booting, years ago? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
idl Retired Dev
Joined: 24 Dec 2002 Posts: 1728 Location: Nottingham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Senso wrote: | port001 wrote: |
lilo writes its config to the MBR, grub writes its config location to the MBR. Grub works out from the config what kernel to boot, and configures itself accordingly. |
So basically, since grub doesn't write itself to the MBR, does that means Windows doesn't try to rewrite the MBR, like it did with lilo when I was dual-booting, years ago? |
Grub does write to the MBR, it just doesn't write its config to the MBR. It reads your grub.conf when the boot selection apears. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Unne l33t
Joined: 21 Jul 2003 Posts: 616
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm biased against lilo because of experiences a couple years ago with 1024th cyllander limits. Even though lilo is better now, grub is fine for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geekX Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 86 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use lilo, because it is easy to set up. Actually - I know how to set it up, so I haven't even bothered to try grub. I only see my boot loader when things don't work and once in a blue moon anyway. _________________ Sometimes I feel like Superman.
Sometimes I'm just recuperating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aLEczapKA Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2003 Posts: 192
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
grub is also easy to set up - it only seems so hard at the first time...
but the main reason I use grub: it allows me to hide linux disks from winblowz - I have dual boot - first disk is linux, second winblowz. So windows thinks it's the first drive available (C:\) and it doesn't mess with my linux disks/partitions as it happend when I used lilo. _________________ while true; do eject /dev/cdrom; eject -t /dev/cdrom; done |
|
Back to top |
|
|
amne Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Nov 2002 Posts: 6378 Location: Graz / EU
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
singleboot system (gentoo only, so i don't care where the bootloader is installed, no windows to mess it up), already had a lilo.conf for years from my old suse install, didn't understand grubs config file immedeately - so i stayed with lilo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
masseya Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 2602 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Please follow up to Which bootloader? _________________ if i never try anything, i never learn anything..
if i never take a risk, i stay where i am.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|