Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
2.6.23-kamikaze1: "Die computer, die die die!"
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:23 pm    Post subject: 2.6.23-kamikaze1: "Die computer, die die die!" Reply with quote

· KAMIKAZE-SOURCES ::.
· 2.6.23-kamikaze1: "Die computer, die die die!"




New version of "kamikaze-sources" !!

NOTE: reiser4 patch doesn't work properly!!

Links:
Quote:
Homepage: http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info

Ebuild: kamikaze-sources-2.6.23-r1.ebuild
Patch: linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1.bz2
Broken-out: broken-out-2.6.23-kamikaze1.tar.bz2
Broken-Out patches:http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info/patches/2.6.23/kamikaze1/broken-out


Also on custom-kernels overlay!


What's new:
Quote:
Kernel updated and many patches updated.


Changes in this version:
Quote:
Kernel updated to 2.6.23
"sched-cfs-devel" patch added.
"sched-cfs-boost-tunables" patch updated.
"genpatches" patch updated.
"hrtimers" patch updated.
"alsa-cvs" patch readded.
"fujitsu-laptop-extras" patch added.
"thinkpad" patch updated.


Patches:
Quote:
# Completely Fair Scheduler (devel)
sched-cfs-devel.patch
sched-cfs-boost.patch
sched-cfs-boost-tunables.patch

# Con Kolivas patchset
ckpatches-2.6.23.patch

# gentoo-sources patchset
genpatches-2.6.23.patch

# -mm patches
cpufreq-allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default.patch
allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default-kconfig-fix.patch

# High Resolution Timers
hrtimers-2.6.23.patch

# 432/864 HZ kconfig
hz-432-kconfig-option.patch
hz-864-kconfig-option.patch

# ALSA CVS
alsa-cvs-20071009-2.6.23.patch

# TuxOnIce
tuxonice-2.2.10.4-for-2.6.23.patch

# Linux-PHC
linux-phc-0.3.1-2.6.23.patch

# edac patches
edac-2.6.23-for-2.6.23.patch

realtime-lsm-2.6.23.patch

# Powersaving patches
powertop-2.6.23.patch
pm_qos-2.6.23.patch

# ACPI patches
acer-acpi-2.6.23.patch
fujitsu-laptop-extras-2.6.23.patch
thinkpad-2.6.23.patch

# Filesystems patches
ext4-updates-2.6.23.patch
reiser4-2.6.23.patch
unionfs-2.6.23.patch

# ATA/SATA patches
sata_nv-sw-ncq-support-2.6.23.patch

cpu-support-rollup-2.6.23.patch

# Mactel
mactel-patches-2.6.23.patch

# Video4Linux
gspca-20070508-2.6.23.patch

# Network/Wireless
ipw3945-1.2.2-2.6.23.patch
iwlwifi-1.1.17-2.6.23.patch

# Misc patches
colored-printk-output-2.6.23.patch
enable-4k-stacks-default-2.6.23.patch
kamikaze-version.patch


Greetings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ilikenwf
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sweet! I am excited!

Now to just wait for 2.6.23-1 to fix the dev's screwups.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mbar
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1944
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what's wrong with reiser4 for .23?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tallica
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 152
Location: Lublin, POL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks :) Gonna try this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mbar wrote:
what's wrong with reiser4 for .23?


I have compile problems with .22 patch and .23 patch from -mm causes kernel oops in my machine. Better wait until namesys releases the patch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Janax
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a question - do you have plans for uvesafb?

Thanks for the quick update on the new kernel - trying now!
_________________
Americans for Fair Taxation because the current tax system is not only burdensome but corrupt as well!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Janax wrote:
Just a question - do you have plans for uvesafb?

Thanks for the quick update on the new kernel - trying now!


uvesafb comes with genpatches.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dodo1122
Guru
Guru


Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 347
Location: York, England

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

heh, can't wait for reiser4 patch for 2.6.23 :? will have to mask the .23 for now...



dodo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tallica
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 152
Location: Lublin, POL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm getting these errors:

Code:
>>> Messages generated by process 11898 on 2007-10-10 17:20:29 for package sys-fs/fuse-2.7.0:

ERROR: setup
  You need to build the FUSE module from the kernel source, because your kernel is too new
Please check to make sure these options are set correctly.
Failure to do so may cause unexpected problems.
Once you have satisfied these options, please try merging
this package again.

ERROR: sys-fs/fuse-2.7.0 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1670:   Called dyn_setup
  ebuild.sh, line 719:   Called qa_call 'pkg_setup'
  ebuild.sh, line 44:   Called pkg_setup
  fuse-2.7.0.ebuild, line 29:   Called linux-mod_pkg_setup
  linux-mod.eclass, line 465:   Called linux-info_pkg_setup
  linux-info.eclass, line 576:   Called check_extra_config
  linux-info.eclass, line 475:   Called die

Incorrect kernel configuration options
If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/fuse-2.7.0/temp/build.log'.


and with nvidia-drivers "Access violation"
Code:
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda


Is it safe to disable sandbox.... ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2686
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Compiled and booted fine, but on reboot it kind of hung for about 90 seconds here:

Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc800-0xc807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc808-0xc80f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio

Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide1...

and later at udev setup the same thing happened- also in 2-3 other places I had shorter hangs. This has never happened before. I'm using my 2622-kamikaze1 config file, but did disable a few things i didn;t need- unrelated to any ytpe of booting hangup AFAIK.

Anyway, kernel booted OK, and seems to be running fine so far.

Any ideas as to why this boot hanging would occur? It seemed like it must have been going through drastically longer probing routines.

I have a 26.23-rc4 with (ingo RT patch) kernel on another box that this didn't happen on, and no other kernels on this box do it either.

It must be either something in 2.6.23 final, something in kamikaze1, or one of the few little things I changed in my config file (disabled CPU Frequency scaling, some ethernet modules, and some ACPI stuff). Really don't see how any of my config weaks could cause a 90 second hang on IDE and BM-DMA stuff.

Googling hasn't clued me in yet- will keep trying to figure this out, with recompile without the little changes I made in config, and compiling a clean and simple 2.6.23 vanilla.
_________________
Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2686
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rebooted, and same thing happens. (I was wrong on the udev stuff- that's OK). It seems to be related to the hard drives, and my cd/dvd burner. That's where it hangs up on probing them, for a total of about 3 minutes.

Could this have something to do with the ATA/SATA patches? Once it gets done with htis section, it proceeds normally. I have noticed windows/apps don't open as snappily now- there is a .5 or so second delay sometimes. Here's a little more context from /var/log/messages:
Quote:
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 10
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PCI: setting IRQ 10 as level-triggered
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.1[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PCI: VIA VLink IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.1, from 255 to 10
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: chipset revision 6
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc800-0xc807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc808-0xc80f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide1...
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo hdc: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-1635S, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo hdc: selected mode 0x44
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo hdc: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(66)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: version 2.3
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PCI: setting IRQ 11 as level-triggered
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.0[B] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi0 : sata_via
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi1 : sata_via
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0001b000 ctl 0x0001b402 bmdma 0x0001c000 irq 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0001b800 ctl 0x0001bc02 bmdma 0x0001c008 irq 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1.00: ATA-7: ST3250823AS, 3.03, max UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2.00: ATA-7: ST3250823AS, 3.03, max UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250823AS 3.03 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 sda6 sda7 sda8 sda9 sda10 sda11 sda12 sda13 sda14 >
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250823AS 3.03 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sdb: sdb1 sdb2 < sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 sdb8 >
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:PS2K,PNP0f13:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12

At the end, there is something not in the log about "could not lock modprobe UHCI_HCD. Doesn't exist" or something to that effect.
_________________
Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2686
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK- compiled a vanilla 2.6.23 kernel with only these patches applied from your kamikazi1 repository:

sched-cfs-devel.patch
sched-cfs-boost.patch
sched-cfs-boost-tunables.patch
ckpatches-2.6.23.patch
genpatches-2.6.23.patch
hrtimers-2.6.23.patch
cpu-support-rollup-2.6.23.patch
enable-4k-stacks-default-2.6.23.patch

Seems to have solved the boot hang problems I had. It paused briefly at the same place, but only for about 15-20 seconds (seems normal time to probe), as compared to 2-3 minutes before with the full kamikaze1. No other problems during boot.

Also, none of the delays in window/apps opening are now ocurring.

My conclusion is it's not in 2.6.23 vanilla, or my config (used same config I just used in 2.6.23-kamikaze1), but must be in one of the other patches from kamikaze1 I didn't use this time.

Anyone else running into this- or is it just on this box?

EDIT: I just noticed this in the log- This time, at the exact point where it did hang, it switched to high resolution mode on CPU, whereas last time it didn't! :o

Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo VP_IDE: chipset revision 6
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc800-0xc807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc808-0xc80f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
[Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide1...
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo hdc: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-1635S, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo hdc: selected mode 0x44
_________________
Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0


Last edited by wrc1944 on Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
prestige
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 95

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:

  CC      kernel/power/main.o
  CC      kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.o
kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.c:134: error: 'pm_ops' undeclared here (not in a function)
kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.c:134: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'pm_ops'
make[2]: *** [kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [kernel/power] Error 2
make: *** [kernel] Error 2


:(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dottout
l33t
l33t


Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 882

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
  CC [M]  drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.o
drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.c:84: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.c: In function ‘acpi_fuj02b1_notify’:
drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.c:489: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_generate_event’

fujitsu acpi module fails..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wrc1944, I don't know which patch is doing that. I'm suspecting in TuxOnIce patch.

prestige, post your .config. TuxOnIce compiles fine in my laptop.

Dottout, I'll fix that for kamikaze2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dottout
l33t
l33t


Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 882

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

great, did you find already somewhere a solution? if so, pls give me the link, Ill patch kamikaze1 for now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5489
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yay ! :D

gonna try it soon :)

@waninkoko:

you tried 2.6.23-rc1-mm1' reiser4 + namesys' patches ?

ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.23-rc1-mm1
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
prestige
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 95

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
...
prestige, post your .config. TuxOnIce compiles fine in my laptop.
...


It seems CONFIG_TOI_CORE can not be compiled as a module. I changed CONFIG_TOI_CORE=m to "y" and it compiles fine. Sorry if this is a known issue.

Thank you for the best linux patch-set and the quick 2.6.23-kamikaze1 release!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dottout
l33t
l33t


Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 882

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

according to kernel changelog:
Quote:
ACPI: Schedule /proc/acpi/event for removal

Schedule /proc/acpi/event for removal in 6 months.

Re-name acpi_bus_generate_event() to acpi_bus_generate_proc_event()
to make sure there is no confusion that it is for /proc/acpi/event only.

Add CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT to allow removal of /proc/acpi/event.
There is no functional change if CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y


this is my patch:
Code:

--- fuj02b1_acpi.c.old      2007-10-10 21:50:53.000000000 +0200
+++ fuj02b1_acpi.c  2007-10-10 21:55:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -486,15 +486,15 @@
                case ACPI_FUJ02B1_NOTIFY_STATUS:
                        acpi_fuj02b1_get_volume_state(fuj02b1);
                        if (fuj02b1->volume_changed == 1)
-                               acpi_bus_generate_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->volume_level | (fuj02b1->mute_state * 0x1000000) | 0x10000000);
+                               acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->volume_level | (fuj02b1->mute_state * 0x1000000) | 0x10000000);

                        acpi_fuj02b1_get_brightness_state(fuj02b1);
                        if (fuj02b1->brightness_changed == 1)
-                               acpi_bus_generate_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->brightness_level | 0x20000000);
+                               acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->brightness_level | 0x20000000);

                        acpi_fuj02b1_get_pointer_state(fuj02b1);
                        if (fuj02b1->pointer_changed == 1)
-                               acpi_bus_generate_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->pointer_state | 0x30000000);
+                               acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->pointer_state | 0x30000000);
                        break;
                default:
                        ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,


ps. its a poor attempt, since this driver wasn't working here. renaming acpi_bus_generate_event allowed me to compile the driver, modprobe loads it with no error but dmesg shows no output about it


Last edited by Dottout on Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ocin
Guru
Guru


Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 500

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michal_86 wrote:
I'm getting these errors:

[...]

and with nvidia-drivers "Access violation"
Code:
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda


Is it safe to disable sandbox.... ?

just disable usersandbox ->
Code:
FEATURES="-usersandbox" emerge nvidia-drivers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5489
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you're my hero :)

finally energy-saving on the intel HD 8)
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brot
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

verynice :)

Works great here, except the "sandbox issue" - but i dont know if it is a bug of portage or the ebuild. Anyways.. thank you for your work Waninkoko
_________________
Use your free CPU-Time on the World Community Grid and make this a better world :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrc1944
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2686
Location: Gainesville, Florida

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko,
Since my log reffered to the cpu mode where apparently something was prevented the high-resolution mode (whatever that means, or if it's even desirable??), I was suspecting:

# -mm patches
cpufreq-allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default.patch
allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default-kconfig-fix.patch

Or maybe the hrtimers was conflicting with one of the other patches??

I thought the TuxOnIce patch had something to do with suspend/hibernation, at least that's what my brief googling led me to believe. In any case, I never enable the suspend or power management stuff in my configs, as I never have had much need for it.

This is pretty much beyond my level of kernel patch knowledge or insight.
_________________
Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
enderandrew
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 731

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There don't appear to be hardly any changes from 2.6.23-rc8 and rc9 or the final 2.6.23 judging from the changelogs.

Reiser4 works in 2.6.23-rc8-mm1 so why not steal that patch?
_________________
Nihilism makes me smile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tallica
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 152
Location: Lublin, POL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

most.idiot wrote:
just disable usersandbox ->
Code:
FEATURES="-usersandbox" emerge nvidia-drivers


this one works for me:
Code:
FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge nvidia-drivers


What about FUSE? Anyone?

EDIT:
Got it! :wink:
Code:
CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y


Last edited by tallica on Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum