| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Waninkoko Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 549
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:23 pm Post subject: 2.6.23-kamikaze1: "Die computer, die die die!" |
|
|
· KAMIKAZE-SOURCES ::.
· 2.6.23-kamikaze1: "Die computer, die die die!"
New version of "kamikaze-sources" !!
NOTE: reiser4 patch doesn't work properly!!
Links:
What's new:
| Quote: | | Kernel updated and many patches updated. |
Changes in this version:
| Quote: | Kernel updated to 2.6.23
"sched-cfs-devel" patch added.
"sched-cfs-boost-tunables" patch updated.
"genpatches" patch updated.
"hrtimers" patch updated.
"alsa-cvs" patch readded.
"fujitsu-laptop-extras" patch added.
"thinkpad" patch updated. |
Patches:
| Quote: | # Completely Fair Scheduler (devel)
sched-cfs-devel.patch
sched-cfs-boost.patch
sched-cfs-boost-tunables.patch
# Con Kolivas patchset
ckpatches-2.6.23.patch
# gentoo-sources patchset
genpatches-2.6.23.patch
# -mm patches
cpufreq-allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default.patch
allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default-kconfig-fix.patch
# High Resolution Timers
hrtimers-2.6.23.patch
# 432/864 HZ kconfig
hz-432-kconfig-option.patch
hz-864-kconfig-option.patch
# ALSA CVS
alsa-cvs-20071009-2.6.23.patch
# TuxOnIce
tuxonice-2.2.10.4-for-2.6.23.patch
# Linux-PHC
linux-phc-0.3.1-2.6.23.patch
# edac patches
edac-2.6.23-for-2.6.23.patch
realtime-lsm-2.6.23.patch
# Powersaving patches
powertop-2.6.23.patch
pm_qos-2.6.23.patch
# ACPI patches
acer-acpi-2.6.23.patch
fujitsu-laptop-extras-2.6.23.patch
thinkpad-2.6.23.patch
# Filesystems patches
ext4-updates-2.6.23.patch
reiser4-2.6.23.patch
unionfs-2.6.23.patch
# ATA/SATA patches
sata_nv-sw-ncq-support-2.6.23.patch
cpu-support-rollup-2.6.23.patch
# Mactel
mactel-patches-2.6.23.patch
# Video4Linux
gspca-20070508-2.6.23.patch
# Network/Wireless
ipw3945-1.2.2-2.6.23.patch
iwlwifi-1.1.17-2.6.23.patch
# Misc patches
colored-printk-output-2.6.23.patch
enable-4k-stacks-default-2.6.23.patch
kamikaze-version.patch |
Greetings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ilikenwf Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 04 Oct 2007 Posts: 119
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sweet! I am excited!
Now to just wait for 2.6.23-1 to fix the dev's screwups. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mbar Veteran


Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 1944 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what's wrong with reiser4 for .23? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tallica Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 152 Location: Lublin, POL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Gonna try this one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waninkoko Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 549
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mbar wrote: | | what's wrong with reiser4 for .23? |
I have compile problems with .22 patch and .23 patch from -mm causes kernel oops in my machine. Better wait until namesys releases the patch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Janax Apprentice


Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 162 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a question - do you have plans for uvesafb?
Thanks for the quick update on the new kernel - trying now! _________________ Americans for Fair Taxation because the current tax system is not only burdensome but corrupt as well! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waninkoko Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 549
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Janax wrote: | Just a question - do you have plans for uvesafb?
Thanks for the quick update on the new kernel - trying now! |
uvesafb comes with genpatches. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dodo1122 Guru


Joined: 02 Sep 2006 Posts: 347 Location: York, England
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heh, can't wait for reiser4 patch for 2.6.23 will have to mask the .23 for now...
dodo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tallica Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 152 Location: Lublin, POL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm getting these errors:
| Code: | >>> Messages generated by process 11898 on 2007-10-10 17:20:29 for package sys-fs/fuse-2.7.0:
ERROR: setup
You need to build the FUSE module from the kernel source, because your kernel is too new
Please check to make sure these options are set correctly.
Failure to do so may cause unexpected problems.
Once you have satisfied these options, please try merging
this package again.
ERROR: sys-fs/fuse-2.7.0 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1670: Called dyn_setup
ebuild.sh, line 719: Called qa_call 'pkg_setup'
ebuild.sh, line 44: Called pkg_setup
fuse-2.7.0.ebuild, line 29: Called linux-mod_pkg_setup
linux-mod.eclass, line 465: Called linux-info_pkg_setup
linux-info.eclass, line 576: Called check_extra_config
linux-info.eclass, line 475: Called die
Incorrect kernel configuration options
If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/fuse-2.7.0/temp/build.log'. |
and with nvidia-drivers "Access violation"
| Code: | open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda |
Is it safe to disable sandbox.... ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wrc1944 Advocate

Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 2686 Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Compiled and booted fine, but on reboot it kind of hung for about 90 seconds here:
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc800-0xc807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc808-0xc80f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct 10 12:36:17 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide1...
and later at udev setup the same thing happened- also in 2-3 other places I had shorter hangs. This has never happened before. I'm using my 2622-kamikaze1 config file, but did disable a few things i didn;t need- unrelated to any ytpe of booting hangup AFAIK.
Anyway, kernel booted OK, and seems to be running fine so far.
Any ideas as to why this boot hanging would occur? It seemed like it must have been going through drastically longer probing routines.
I have a 26.23-rc4 with (ingo RT patch) kernel on another box that this didn't happen on, and no other kernels on this box do it either.
It must be either something in 2.6.23 final, something in kamikaze1, or one of the few little things I changed in my config file (disabled CPU Frequency scaling, some ethernet modules, and some ACPI stuff). Really don't see how any of my config weaks could cause a 90 second hang on IDE and BM-DMA stuff.
Googling hasn't clued me in yet- will keep trying to figure this out, with recompile without the little changes I made in config, and compiling a clean and simple 2.6.23 vanilla. _________________ Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wrc1944 Advocate

Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 2686 Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rebooted, and same thing happens. (I was wrong on the udev stuff- that's OK). It seems to be related to the hard drives, and my cd/dvd burner. That's where it hangs up on probing them, for a total of about 3 minutes.
Could this have something to do with the ATA/SATA patches? Once it gets done with htis section, it proceeds normally. I have noticed windows/apps don't open as snappily now- there is a .5 or so second delay sometimes. Here's a little more context from /var/log/messages:
| Quote: | Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 10
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PCI: setting IRQ 10 as level-triggered
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.1[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 10 (level, low) -> IRQ 10
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PCI: VIA VLink IRQ fixup for 0000:00:0f.1, from 255 to 10
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: chipset revision 6
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc800-0xc807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc808-0xc80f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide1...
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo hdc: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-1635S, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo hdc: selected mode 0x44
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo hdc: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM DVD-R CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(66)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: version 2.3
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PCI: setting IRQ 11 as level-triggered
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.0[B] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sata_via 0000:00:0f.0: routed to hard irq line 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi0 : sata_via
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi1 : sata_via
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0001b000 ctl 0x0001b402 bmdma 0x0001c000 irq 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x0001b800 ctl 0x0001bc02 bmdma 0x0001c008 irq 11
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1.00: ATA-7: ST3250823AS, 3.03, max UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2.00: ATA-7: ST3250823AS, 3.03, max UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250823AS 3.03 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 sda6 sda7 sda8 sda9 sda10 sda11 sda12 sda13 sda14 >
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo scsi 1:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3250823AS 3.03 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 488397168 512-byte hardware sectors (250059 MB)
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sdb: sdb1 sdb2 < sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 sdb8 >
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
Oct 10 13:56:05 gentoo PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:PS2K,PNP0f13:PS2M] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
|
At the end, there is something not in the log about "could not lock modprobe UHCI_HCD. Doesn't exist" or something to that effect. _________________ Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wrc1944 Advocate

Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 2686 Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK- compiled a vanilla 2.6.23 kernel with only these patches applied from your kamikazi1 repository:
sched-cfs-devel.patch
sched-cfs-boost.patch
sched-cfs-boost-tunables.patch
ckpatches-2.6.23.patch
genpatches-2.6.23.patch
hrtimers-2.6.23.patch
cpu-support-rollup-2.6.23.patch
enable-4k-stacks-default-2.6.23.patch
Seems to have solved the boot hang problems I had. It paused briefly at the same place, but only for about 15-20 seconds (seems normal time to probe), as compared to 2-3 minutes before with the full kamikaze1. No other problems during boot.
Also, none of the delays in window/apps opening are now ocurring.
My conclusion is it's not in 2.6.23 vanilla, or my config (used same config I just used in 2.6.23-kamikaze1), but must be in one of the other patches from kamikaze1 I didn't use this time.
Anyone else running into this- or is it just on this box?
EDIT: I just noticed this in the log- This time, at the exact point where it did hang, it switched to high resolution mode on CPU, whereas last time it didn't!
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo VP_IDE: chipset revision 6
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA133 controller on pci0000:00:0f.1
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc800-0xc807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc808-0xc80f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide0...
[Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo Probing IDE interface ide1...
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo hdc: LITE-ON DVDRW SHW-1635S, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Oct 10 15:09:38 gentoo hdc: selected mode 0x44 _________________ Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0
Last edited by wrc1944 on Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
prestige Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
CC kernel/power/main.o
CC kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.o
kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.c:134: error: 'pm_ops' undeclared here (not in a function)
kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.c:134: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'pm_ops'
make[2]: *** [kernel/power/tuxonice_builtin.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [kernel/power] Error 2
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dottout l33t


Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 882
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | CC [M] drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.o
drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.c:84: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.c: In function ‘acpi_fuj02b1_notify’:
drivers/acpi/fuj02b1_acpi.c:489: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_generate_event’
|
fujitsu acpi module fails.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waninkoko Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005 Posts: 549
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wrc1944, I don't know which patch is doing that. I'm suspecting in TuxOnIce patch.
prestige, post your .config. TuxOnIce compiles fine in my laptop.
Dottout, I'll fix that for kamikaze2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dottout l33t


Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 882
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| great, did you find already somewhere a solution? if so, pls give me the link, Ill patch kamikaze1 for now |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kernelOfTruth Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 5490 Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
prestige Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Waninkoko wrote: | ...
prestige, post your .config. TuxOnIce compiles fine in my laptop.
... |
It seems CONFIG_TOI_CORE can not be compiled as a module. I changed CONFIG_TOI_CORE=m to "y" and it compiles fine. Sorry if this is a known issue.
Thank you for the best linux patch-set and the quick 2.6.23-kamikaze1 release! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dottout l33t


Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 882
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
according to kernel changelog:
| Quote: | ACPI: Schedule /proc/acpi/event for removal
Schedule /proc/acpi/event for removal in 6 months.
Re-name acpi_bus_generate_event() to acpi_bus_generate_proc_event()
to make sure there is no confusion that it is for /proc/acpi/event only.
Add CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT to allow removal of /proc/acpi/event.
There is no functional change if CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
|
this is my patch:
| Code: |
--- fuj02b1_acpi.c.old 2007-10-10 21:50:53.000000000 +0200
+++ fuj02b1_acpi.c 2007-10-10 21:55:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -486,15 +486,15 @@
case ACPI_FUJ02B1_NOTIFY_STATUS:
acpi_fuj02b1_get_volume_state(fuj02b1);
if (fuj02b1->volume_changed == 1)
- acpi_bus_generate_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->volume_level | (fuj02b1->mute_state * 0x1000000) | 0x10000000);
+ acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->volume_level | (fuj02b1->mute_state * 0x1000000) | 0x10000000);
acpi_fuj02b1_get_brightness_state(fuj02b1);
if (fuj02b1->brightness_changed == 1)
- acpi_bus_generate_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->brightness_level | 0x20000000);
+ acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->brightness_level | 0x20000000);
acpi_fuj02b1_get_pointer_state(fuj02b1);
if (fuj02b1->pointer_changed == 1)
- acpi_bus_generate_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->pointer_state | 0x30000000);
+ acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(device, event, (u32) fuj02b1->pointer_state | 0x30000000);
break;
default:
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
|
ps. its a poor attempt, since this driver wasn't working here. renaming acpi_bus_generate_event allowed me to compile the driver, modprobe loads it with no error but dmesg shows no output about it
Last edited by Dottout on Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ocin Guru

Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 500
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Michal_86 wrote: | I'm getting these errors:
[...]
and with nvidia-drivers "Access violation"
| Code: | open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-kamikaze1/null.gcda |
Is it safe to disable sandbox.... ? |
just disable usersandbox -> | Code: | | FEATURES="-usersandbox" emerge nvidia-drivers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kernelOfTruth Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 5490 Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brot Guru


Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 318
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
verynice
Works great here, except the "sandbox issue" - but i dont know if it is a bug of portage or the ebuild. Anyways.. thank you for your work Waninkoko _________________ Use your free CPU-Time on the World Community Grid and make this a better world  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wrc1944 Advocate

Joined: 15 Aug 2002 Posts: 2686 Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Waninkoko,
Since my log reffered to the cpu mode where apparently something was prevented the high-resolution mode (whatever that means, or if it's even desirable??), I was suspecting:
# -mm patches
cpufreq-allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default.patch
allow-ondemand-and-conservative-cpufreq-governors-to-be-used-as-default-kconfig-fix.patch
Or maybe the hrtimers was conflicting with one of the other patches??
I thought the TuxOnIce patch had something to do with suspend/hibernation, at least that's what my brief googling led me to believe. In any case, I never enable the suspend or power management stuff in my configs, as I never have had much need for it.
This is pretty much beyond my level of kernel patch knowledge or insight. _________________ Main box- ASRock 880GM-LE AM3
Phenom II x6 1090T, 3.2 GHz, 8GB GSkill DDR3 1333mhz
Samsung SATA 500GB, Radeon HD 6570 2GB DDR3
Gentoo ~x86, ~amd64, glibc-2.17, gcc-4.7.2, kernel 3.8.11, 3.9.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
enderandrew l33t


Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Posts: 731
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There don't appear to be hardly any changes from 2.6.23-rc8 and rc9 or the final 2.6.23 judging from the changelogs.
Reiser4 works in 2.6.23-rc8-mm1 so why not steal that patch? _________________ Nihilism makes me smile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tallica Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 152 Location: Lublin, POL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| most.idiot wrote: | just disable usersandbox -> | Code: | | FEATURES="-usersandbox" emerge nvidia-drivers |
|
this one works for me:
| Code: | | FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge nvidia-drivers |
What about FUSE? Anyone?
EDIT:
Got it!
Last edited by tallica on Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|