| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stormcrowley Apprentice


Joined: 11 Mar 2004 Posts: 166 Location: Sacramento, California, United States, North America, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 2:26 am Post subject: Avatar Size |
|
|
| The current restriction is 80x80 pixels. Would anyone have objections to increasing the size to 100x100? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
klieber Administrator


Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3655 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 6:32 am Post subject: Re: Avatar Size |
|
|
| stormcrowley wrote: | | The current restriction is 80x80 pixels. Would anyone have objections to increasing the size to 100x100? |
Yes. This has been discussed before and the current plan is to stay at 80x80.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stormcrowley Apprentice


Joined: 11 Mar 2004 Posts: 166 Location: Sacramento, California, United States, North America, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bah, alright. What are the reasons for staying at 80x80, if you don't mind me asking? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
klieber Administrator


Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3655 Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stormcrowley wrote: | | Bah, alright. What are the reasons for staying at 80x80, if you don't mind me asking? |
Primarily because screen real estate should be devoted to the message itself, rather than extraneous avatars.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stormcrowley Apprentice


Joined: 11 Mar 2004 Posts: 166 Location: Sacramento, California, United States, North America, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe
|
Posted: Fri May 14, 2004 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Very well. I'll dust GIMP off and do some resizing, then. Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
old school Apprentice


Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 166 Location: Eugene, Oregon. USA.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:42 am Post subject: Re: Avatar Size |
|
|
| stormcrowley wrote: | | The current restriction is 80x80 pixels. Would anyone have objections to increasing the size to 100x100? |
How about now?
edit: Take pity on us older users, with our hardening retinas.  _________________ The hammer of the gods,
Will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying:
"Valhalla, I am coming!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 15634 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:37 pm Post subject: Re: Avatar Size |
|
|
| klieber wrote: | | Yes. This has been discussed before and the current plan is to stay at 80x80. |
| klieber wrote: | | Primarily because screen real estate should be devoted to the message itself, rather than extraneous avatars. | My vote is for 80x80 still. _________________ Resolve the issue, one way or the other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amne Administrator


Joined: 17 Nov 2002 Posts: 6289 Location: Graz / EU
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oops, wanted to answer here the other day, too and forgot until i saw pjp's reply.
I think 80x80 should be enough, too, big avatars can become quite annoying. _________________ Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Earthwings Administrator


Joined: 14 Apr 2003 Posts: 7350 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just imagine something like a can of Königsberger Klopse in 100x100 Pixel, aweful  _________________ KDE 4.1 - Get It While It's Hot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokehabit Veteran


Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 3135 Location: Somewhere nowhere near the north of Italy
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
80x80 is ok, i just wish the size could be more than 7kb. Why was it moved from 8kb to 7kb? _________________ pkgcore, the newest and best portage replacement |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 15634 Location: Colorado
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokehabit Veteran


Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 3135 Location: Somewhere nowhere near the north of Italy
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2 years ago? 3 years ago? It was a long time ago, thats all i remember _________________ pkgcore, the newest and best portage replacement |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Headrush Veteran


Joined: 05 Nov 2003 Posts: 5580 Location: Bizarro World
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cokehabit wrote: | | 2 years ago? 3 years ago? It was a long time ago, thats all i remember |
Yes. When I joined the forums about 3 years ago I remember trying to make sure my avatar size was 8kb also. (not that it really matters. ) _________________ Mac OS X 10.4.8 (Gentoo in Parallels now)
AMD64 Opteron Dual Core 4400+, 2x1GB DDR400, GeforceFX 7900GS Extra Pipelines Unlocked
300GB SATA Maxtor HD , Sony DRU810A DVD Burner, FlyVideo 3000 TV, SB Live! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kallamej Administrator


Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 4467 Location: Göteborg, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
There used to be a limit of 14k combined for avatar and signature image. The file and image size checks didn't really work until last summer. _________________ Please read our FAQ Forum, it answers many of your questions.
irc: #gentoo-forums on irc.freenode.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokehabit Veteran


Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 3135 Location: Somewhere nowhere near the north of Italy
|
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kallamej wrote: | | There used to be a limit of 14k combined for avatar and signature image. The file and image size checks didn't really work until last summer. | so we can have it back to 8kb? _________________ pkgcore, the newest and best portage replacement |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gentree Veteran


Joined: 30 Jun 2003 Posts: 4473 Location: France, Old Europe
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 10:30 am Post subject: Re: Avatar Size |
|
|
| old school wrote: | | stormcrowley wrote: | | The current restriction is 80x80 pixels. Would anyone have objections to increasing the size to 100x100? |
How about now?
edit: Take pity on us older users, with our hardening retinas.  |
when your new glasses come through try googling for geriatric presbyopia , I think you'll find it's the lens that hardens not the retina!
Avatars are intended for a graphic of some character you wish to use to represent yourself on the forum not for your granny's holiday snaps or you favourite album cover.
you can actually do quite a bit with 80x80 in jpeg or gif. It seems a very good choice to me.
If you see someone trying to cram a group photo instead of an avatar please report the abuse. (no names mentioned).  _________________ Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not worth paying for.
KX7-333 , AthlonXP1800+ @2.3GHz
AthlonXP-M on AN7 @ 2.6/2.4GHz (winter/summer)
2.6.20-nicus1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
no_hope Guru


Joined: 23 Jun 2003 Posts: 477 Location: Madison, WI, USA! USA! USA!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amne Administrator


Joined: 17 Nov 2002 Posts: 6289 Location: Graz / EU
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the examples, no_hope, we've just discussed it and decided that 80x80 still looks best.  _________________ Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokehabit Veteran


Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 3135 Location: Somewhere nowhere near the north of Italy
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The dimensions (80x80) is perfect, what needs to be changed is the image size (MB) _________________ pkgcore, the newest and best portage replacement |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Think4UrS11 Moderator


Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 5429 Location: Murphy is my neighbor
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cokehabit wrote: | | The dimensions (80x80) is perfect, what needs to be changed is the image size (MB) |
mhh 80x80x4=25kb then? use jpg/png compression  _________________ Nothing is secure / Security is always a trade-off with usability / Do not assume anything / Trust no-one, nothing / Paranoia is your friend / Think for yourself |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokehabit Veteran


Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 3135 Location: Somewhere nowhere near the north of Italy
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Think4UrS11 wrote: | | cokehabit wrote: | | The dimensions (80x80) is perfect, what needs to be changed is the image size (MB) |
mhh 80x80x4=25kb then? use jpg/png compression  | 7kb is crap though. 15kb would be better. It used to be 8kb but they changed it about 2 years ago _________________ pkgcore, the newest and best portage replacement |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Earthwings Administrator


Joined: 14 Apr 2003 Posts: 7350 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone should just use dinosaurs as avatars. Despite their huge natural size, you can get an image size small enough to animate them within the 7kb limit  _________________ KDE 4.1 - Get It While It's Hot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ToeiRei l33t


Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 661 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
This topic is funny somehow. Why are users never satisfied with what they got? There are discussion forums that do not allow avatars at all...
Rei _________________ Blog | btrfs | The mailer daemon is busy burning your messages in hell... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amne Administrator


Joined: 17 Nov 2002 Posts: 6289 Location: Graz / EU
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Earthwings wrote: | Everyone should just use dinosaurs as avatars. Despite their huge natural size, you can get an image size small enough to animate them within the 7kb limit  |
Agreed. We should declare this week dinosaur week. _________________ Dinosaur week! (Ok, this thread is so last week) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokehabit Veteran


Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 3135 Location: Somewhere nowhere near the north of Italy
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| amne wrote: | | Earthwings wrote: | Everyone should just use dinosaurs as avatars. Despite their huge natural size, you can get an image size small enough to animate them within the 7kb limit  |
Agreed. We should declare this week dinosaur week. | Agreed _________________ pkgcore, the newest and best portage replacement |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|