| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ecce Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:53 pm Post subject: quick question: what release for c2d? |
|
|
| Sitting here with nothing but links2 to surf with, so please help me with this: Which release is best to download for a C2D? Will AMD64 work or is it ia64 the one I should pick? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paapaa l33t


Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 955 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you want 64-bit then AMD64 is the correct one. If you want 32-bit then use i686. There _might_ be problems with JMicron PATA controller with 2006.1 CD. Report back if you have problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
floffe Guru


Joined: 24 Nov 2003 Posts: 414 Location: Linköping, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't try IA64, won't work. It's for Itaniums. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d2_racing Moderator


Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13034 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMOO, you can just install a 32 bits i686 installation, because I think that the x86_64 can be pretty hard to install and also when you have a x86_64, I think that you can have both 32-bits and 64 bits application, so it can become a real mess to use. _________________ Sysadmin of GentooQuébec.org
Wiki
Signature
IRC on Freenode : #gentoo-quebec |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Monkeh Veteran


Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 1656 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| d2_racing wrote: | | because I think that the x86_64 can be pretty hard to install |
Not really. It's no different to x86..
| Quote: | | and also when you have a x86_64, I think that you can have both 32-bits and 64 bits application, so it can become a real mess to use. |
You can have both 32 and 64 bit programs, but it only becomes a mess if you make it one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ecce Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 22 Oct 2005 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
System up now, and I have used it for about a week. I really can't complain about the speed, compiling code is lightning fast compared to my old AMD2400+. Two cores makes all the difference in the world!
64 bits brought some problems along just as expected:
* Sun java won't work out of the box. There's some doc about using the 32-bit version at java.com, but I'll guess that means Firefox must also be compiled 32-bit, and that means QT has to be 32-bit and so on (since calling 32-bit stuff from 64-bit applications doesn't usually work right?). That poor useless blackdown java thing works (kind of), but things look like S**T and firefox bails out all the time. I finally removed the plugin symlink and now soldier on without java support.
* Flash 9 doesn't like 64 bits either. Really annoying, a lot of web pages requires flash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d2_racing Moderator


Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13034 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's why a 32 bits installation is more simple than a 64 bits installation. _________________ Sysadmin of GentooQuébec.org
Wiki
Signature
IRC on Freenode : #gentoo-quebec |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ecce wrote: | System up now, and I have used it for about a week. I really can't complain about the speed, compiling code is lightning fast compared to my old AMD2400+. Two cores makes all the difference in the world!
64 bits brought some problems along just as expected:
* Sun java won't work out of the box. There's some doc about using the 32-bit version at java.com, but I'll guess that means Firefox must also be compiled 32-bit, and that means QT has to be 32-bit and so on (since calling 32-bit stuff from 64-bit applications doesn't usually work right?). That poor useless blackdown java thing works (kind of), but things look like S**T and firefox bails out all the time. I finally removed the plugin symlink and now soldier on without java support.
* Flash 9 doesn't like 64 bits either. Really annoying, a lot of web pages requires flash. |
Hint.. nsplugin-wrapper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloeki Guru


Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 437 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nspw doesn't work with java. flash is fine with it though. _________________ Moved to using Arch Linux
Life is meant to be lived, not given up...
HOLY COW I'M TOTALLY GOING SO FAST OH F***  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|