Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Tweaked glibc 2.4 + 2.5 + snapshot ebuilds
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 29, 30, 31  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vipernicus
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 1462
Location: Your College IT Dept.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:37 am    Post subject: Re: Am I crazy???? Reply with quote

ryszardzonk wrote:
I just tried to play with the ebuilds for the little wild and this is what I come up with.

1) I tried to get new binutils to merge with bidirect flag, however unsuccesfully. then I tried to use it with just a bidirect patch and not the hash+dynsort patch. It failed co merge as well
2) What I tried to merge binutils with bidirect+hashvals patch only (not dynsort) and it merged properly !!! Using just a -Wl,-hashvals produced gcc error in configure that in can not create executables, but what I found out is that placing -Wl,-Bdirect and -Wl,--hash-style=both WORKED! Either I am insane and it is just my sight playing tricks on me or I have it acctually working (Bdirect and new hashvals patch)
3) I am not sure if this is important, but what I did is emerged the toolchain first without old hashlvals and then tried to emerge it with the new ne and it worked. I am almost at the end of emerge world and yet to see a problem

4) I am not sure if plain ebuild from nxsty would work as I added extra OpenSuse patches. If the would be someone that can take further look at it and say why those patches are not in the Gentoo patchset it would be great.
Ebuilds I used
http://bigvo.dyndns.org/binutils.tar.bz2
http://bigvo.dyndns.org/glibc.tar.bz2


Hate to break it to you, but you're missing the glibc patch for -bdirect.
_________________
Viper-Sources Maintainer || nesl247 Projects || vipernicus.org blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nirax
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 319
Location: Germany, old Europe

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomee wrote:
R-Type wrote:
Code:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I.
make[4]: *** [bfdsort.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2

I get this when building the new binutils-2.17.50.0.5 build from your overlay. the bdirect useflag is enabled. This is on amd64.

Bump, same here. Binutils-2.17.50.0.5 from official tree emerged OK.


same error trying to compile with bdirect flag binutils 2.17.50.0.5. without bdirect flag it compiles though, but having the whole system already bdirected i woudl like to stay with it. strange that this error is still there. (Read about it nearly one month before :)
_________________
quot licet iovi non licet bovi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ryszardzonk
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 182
Location: Rzeszów, POLAND

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Am I crazy???? Reply with quote

vipernicus wrote:
Hate to break it to you, but you're missing the glibc patch for -bdirect.

I'm glad that You found the time to take a closer look at the patchset. I must say that from the beginning I was thinking it is to good to be true :o But if this is true how come neither opensuse patchset does not have it nor the toolchain overlay based on them. Maybe it is not needed? (I know -bdirect is not in the official glibc) When I first switched to -Bdirect stuff I noticed quite a jump in app loading time and I must say it sure didn't decrease now at least visually while I am using these two.
_________________
Sky is not the limit...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok i'm done with Bdirect, removed it from flags and re-emerged the world with ---.6 portage binutils. this thread seems to freeze... :cry:
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spruit_elf
n00b
n00b


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nxsty wrote:
abhay wrote:
nxsty wrote:
Everbody using binutils 2.17.50.0.5 from portage should use this ebuild instead as the regression is pretty serious (binutils bug #3314) Get it from toolchain_overlay.

Damn!!! I just completed moving to new hashstyle and compiled whole world using this binutils version. Does this mean I have to recompile everything AGAIN? :(
How bad is it?


If you´re on 64 bit you should or all your binaries will be unnecessary large. It doesn´t seem to be a problem on 32 bit.


is the official 2.17.50.0.6 also broken or is it safe?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
na641
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 169
Location: Sacramento

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:52 pm    Post subject: Anyone else having fetch problems Reply with quote

I'm having difficulty pulling in the glibc patches/files. I figured i should wait a few days before posting to see if the issue would resolve itself, but alas it has not. Anyway, i browsed through to the online directory that hosts the files and the site is functioning fine, the files just aren't there. Could anyone perhaps offer up these missing files? Particularly 'glibc-2.5-patches-1.2.tar.bz2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S. Traaken
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 135

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try here for the time being.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
na641
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 169
Location: Sacramento

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

S. Traaken wrote:
Try here for the time being.


Thanks for the link, but i fixed the problem shortly after posting. I pulled the files for the portage glibc and saw that the patches were at 1.3, so i changed the overlay ebuild from 1.2 to 1.3 and it worked :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

na641 wrote:
S. Traaken wrote:
Try here for the time being.


Thanks for the link, but i fixed the problem shortly after posting. I pulled the files for the portage glibc and saw that the patches were at 1.3, so i changed the overlay ebuild from 1.2 to 1.3 and it worked :)


Thanks for confirming it works, I've bumped the ebuild to use 1.3.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S. Traaken
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 135

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still waiting for a fix for binutils on amd64...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nirax
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 319
Location: Germany, old Europe

PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i am recompiling the gentoo standard glibc and binutils as the key people embedding changes to this builds seem to have lost interest and we have open issues with amd64 for long time now.
thanks for the great compilation nxsty though and the time spent to put all together !
_________________
quot licet iovi non licet bovi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JoKo
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 16 May 2004
Posts: 141
Location: Xanthi, Greece

PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
!!! A file listed in the Manifest could not be found: '/usr/local/overlays/toolchain_overlay/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.5.ebuild'


This is what I get if I try to emerge glibc-2.5.90.20061022-r1. I've fixed it by digesting the ebuild again...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tscolin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 07 Dec 2005
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

is this still being maintained?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FireBurn
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 165
Location: Edinburgh, UK

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It had been v quite on here

I don't feel like I'm on the bleeding edge with a glibc that's more than a month old!

He he
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nesl247
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nxsty doesn't seem to be online anymore. I'll have to do some poking at him via private message.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pal_gene
n00b
n00b


Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FireBurn wrote:
I don't feel like I'm on the bleeding edge with a glibc that's more than a month old!

yes, i felt also. so, i create with cvs-head by composite nxsty ebuild.
it is completely same patches from last 1022-r1.ebuild exclude branch update.
but minor sync with portage on ebuild detail strings.

i test on only x86-system and follow near safety env.
Code:
Portage 2.1.2_rc3 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5.90.20061210-r0, 2.6.19-gentoo-r1 i686)
System uname: 2.6.19-gentoo-r1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm)
sys-devel/binutils:  2.17.50.0.8
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.19

CFLAGS=CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=gnu"



http://palgene-overlay.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/overlay/sys-libs/glibc/
http://palgene-overlay.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/distfiles/


  • glibc-2.5-branch-update-20061210.patch.bz2 branch update for 20061210
  • glibc-2.5-patches-1.4.tar.bz2 only minor fix against 20061210 patches based 1.3.
  • glibc-2.5-extra_patches-1.4.tar.bz2 no-any difference nxsty extra patches
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5695
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

testing it right now, thanks :D
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tscolin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 07 Dec 2005
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

im just trying to keep this on page 1 of forum list so it isn't forgotten. I hope nxsty comes back soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boris64
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Oct 2003
Posts: 1770
Location: vechelde / peine

PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth wrote:
testing it right now, thanks :D

Did the new glibc kill your computer or are you just a
bit too busy to give a short report?
Thx in advance ;)
_________________
boris64.net 200x / visit my desktop / try these tiny kernel patches ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5695
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry for the long delay, yeah, I'm a little busy:

here my experiences so far:

works fine with USE="glibc-omitfp hardened nls nptl nptlonly " (tested on x86)

works fine with gcc 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 :D , it's feels pretty stable & responsive, haven't run a benchmark though, so I can't tell you if there were any improvements in performance ...

pal_gene has done a good job :wink:


kudos to nxsty for his patches & good work, hope he continues this ...
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D


Last edited by kernelOfTruth on Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:57 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nbvcxz
Guru
Guru


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 379
Location: Kraków / PL

PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

here also works fine for few days (compiled with 4.2.0), but I can not compile it (and any other glibc) with 4.3.0
thx pal_gene
_________________
nBVCXz
zen-kernel (bfq compcache) | /tmp -> tmpfs | ext4 | zsh | xfce | schedtool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mbar
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 1952
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pal_gene wrote:

i test on only x86-system and follow near safety env.


So I'm going to test it on AMD64 :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pal_gene
n00b
n00b


Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i modified to pass glibc testsuite and somehing wrong against gentoo glibc-compat.

FEATURES="test" will pass now.
elf/check-localplt test needs some modify for glibc-ssp-compat if only don't have USE="glibc-compat20".
so, scripts/data/localplt-{i386,x86_64}-linux-gnu.data was changed in this ebuild.
But i can't test on amd64.
*additional export func.
0010_all_glibc-ssp-compat.patch:__stack_chk_fail
6901_all_2.4-amd64-strings-20061210:__bzero

FEATURES="test" USE="alltest" will pass with required toolchain.

testing_note
Code:

you can test glibc by glibc testsuite set enviroment FEATURES="test" when emerging glibc.
skip test nptl/tst-cancel1 by default. you can test nptl/tst-cancel1 with USE="alltest".

WARNING! During test, system become high load on some test.


-nptl/tst-mutex5,tst-cond*:
failing sometimes randomly for me.
it is timing problem, i think it depend on kernel timer or preemptible or scheduler.
application must engage timing can use rt(realtime) code, thus it should be harmless.
see http://www.osdl.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34

- nptl/tst-cancel1
stop with "Didn't expect signal from child: got `Aborted'"
this seem to fail with not supported toolchain (gcc,binutils and other debugging with gdb).
DW_CFA_val_{offset{,_sf},expresion} is supported since gcc-4.2, binutils-2.17.
see http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-09/msg00039.html


glibc-2.5.90.20061214

  • Synced with portage on minor string diff
  • New snapshot (20061214)
  • Correct distfiles URL
  • Fix some test error and maintain default ignore tests
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5695
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

works fine here on x86 & gcc 4.2 :D

thanks :!:
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tscolin
n00b
n00b


Joined: 07 Dec 2005
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pal_gene, thank you for maintaining glibc!!! your a godsend in the absence of nxsty. Could you make your own thread tho? cant say its very manageable w/ your ebuilds being on page 30
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 30 of 31

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum