Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Tweaked glibc 2.4 + 2.5 + snapshot ebuilds
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 28, 29, 30, 31  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tomee
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 38
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

R-Type wrote:
Code:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I. -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -march=athlon64 -mtune=athlon64 -O3 -pipe -c /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/bfdsort.o
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:96: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'bfd_qsort_closure_func'
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:97: warning: no previous prototype for 'bfd_qsort'
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c: In function 'bfd_qsort':
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:128: error: 'cmp' undeclared (first use in this function)
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[4]: *** [bfdsort.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2


I get this when building the new binutils-2.17.50.0.5 build from your overlay. the bdirect useflag is enabled. This is on amd64.


Bump, same here. Binutils-2.17.50.0.5 from official tree emerged OK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
octapus
n00b
n00b


Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm trying to compile binutils with bdirect enabled but i get the same error messages as "tomee" and "R-Type" (inside bfdsort.c).
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.5 [2.17.50.0.3] USE="bdirect%* nls -multislot (-multitarget) -test -vanilla" 0 kB [3]

I too run a x86_64.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:40 am    Post subject: all messed up.. as usual. Reply with quote

I know this message shouldn't be here, but here's where all the geeks are. And I'm next to desperate.
I had two versions of binutils installed on my system - 2.17 from nxsty and 2.17.50.0.3 from portage. The first one was in actual use.
One damned moment I decided to try the 2nd version and did `binutils-config 2` from the shell. As you may guess, nothing ever worked after that.
I booted Knoppix, but I can't chroot to my / : "chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory". Not any other command may I run with chroot. And the executables are there.
I made it to /etc/env.d/binutils/ and re-pointed CURRENT to 2.17, hoping it would work - nope. Kernel panic, not syncing, no init found, specify on command line.. Well, I don't use initrd.

Is there any way out?????
8O
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nxsty
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 12:15 pm    Post subject: Re: all messed up.. as usual. Reply with quote

nowinter wrote:
I know this message shouldn't be here, but here's where all the geeks are. And I'm next to desperate.
I had two versions of binutils installed on my system - 2.17 from nxsty and 2.17.50.0.3 from portage. The first one was in actual use.
One damned moment I decided to try the 2nd version and did `binutils-config 2` from the shell. As you may guess, nothing ever worked after that.
I booted Knoppix, but I can't chroot to my / : "chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory". Not any other command may I run with chroot. And the executables are there.
I made it to /etc/env.d/binutils/ and re-pointed CURRENT to 2.17, hoping it would work - nope. Kernel panic, not syncing, no init found, specify on command line.. Well, I don't use initrd.

Is there any way out?????
8O


That really doesn´t sound like a binutils problem. Even if you have two incompatible binutils versions installed you should be able to switch betwen them without problems. Something else must be wrong. Are you chroting the right dir? Is the root partition properly mounted? Is the filesystem ok?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thx4reply, nxsty
sorry for misinformating you, it was in fact a glibc issue. the new glibc from your overlay didn't sit well in my system, with both -Bdirect and --hashstyle enabled
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 2:41 pm    Post subject: invalid out-of-map direct binding Reply with quote

I have another sudden problem: tons of messages of the kind as above, e.g.:
8428: Warning: ignoring invalid out-of-map direct binding for symbol strcpy: 0xba0a9fc8

It's like I would have switched to new glibc, but I didn't. Everything was quite fine, incl. emerging stuff. The latest thing I can think of was a qt-3 upgrade: instead of portage's newly unmasked 3.3.6-r3 I emerged 3.3.6-r4 (still ~), replacing my own 3.3.6-r1. Could it be the problem???
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HELP!!!
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't understand that. One of those bdirect errors is
"ignoring invalid out-of-map direct binding for symbol __cxa_finalize: 0x45052"
when I use tab completion, e.g. in
#ls d<tab>

Now, I've opened two terminals (rxvt), one of them produces the warning and the other does not!! :?: :?: :?:
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, it just disappeared. :roll: damn. I emerged the newest kdelibs.. but I think it has disappeared before that.. Total mystery.
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nxsty
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glad to hear it's working now. Anyway I just added the latest -Bdirect patch to my overlay. It might be a good idea to upgrade!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S. Traaken
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 135

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nxsty wrote:
Glad to hear it's working now. Anyway I just added the latest -Bdirect patch to my overlay. It might be a good idea to upgrade!


Are you sure your overlay is up to date? I see no new patch when updating via svn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nxsty
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

S. Traaken wrote:
nxsty wrote:
Glad to hear it's working now. Anyway I just added the latest -Bdirect patch to my overlay. It might be a good idea to upgrade!


Are you sure your overlay is up to date? I see no new patch when updating via svn.


If it has the 1.3 (2.5) or 2.4 (2.5.90) extra patches it´s up to date.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abhay
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 161

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
See `config.log' for more details.

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.5 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1568:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 937:   Called src_compile
  glibc-2.5.ebuild, line 1154:   Called toolchain-glibc_src_compile
  glibc-2.5.ebuild, line 259:   Called glibc_do_configure 'nptl'
  glibc-2.5.ebuild, line 922:   Called die

!!! failed to configure glibc
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.

!!! This ebuild is from an overlay: '/usr/local/overlays/toolchain_overlay'

I just updated the overlay using SVN and now re-compiling glibc throws that error. Can someone please help and tell me what I am doing wrong :?
Code:
# emerge --info
Portage 2.1.2_pre3-r6 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5-r0, 2.6.17-beyond4 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17-beyond4 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.5
Last Sync: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:30:01 +0000
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python:     2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.4-r6
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils:  2.17.50.0.6
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.14
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=prescott -march=prescott -fforce-addr -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -pipe -fno-ident"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=prescott -march=prescott -fforce-addr -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -pipe -fno-ident -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-enforce-eh-specs"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict userpriv usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org/ http://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/gentoo.org/ http://gentoo.osuosl.org/ http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=both"
LINGUAS="en"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=3600 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage /usr/local/overlays/toolchain_overlay"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X a52 aac acpi aiglx alsa amr arts artswrappersuid avi berkdb bitmap-fonts branding bzip2 cairo cddb cdr cli cracklib crypt cups curl dbus dga dlloader dri dts dvd dvdr elibc_glibc emboss encode ffmpeg firefox flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif glitz gpm gstreamer gtk hal i8x0 imlib input_devices_evdev input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse isdnlog jpeg jpeg2k kde kdeenablefinal kdehiddenvisibility kdenewldflags kernel_linux lcms ldap libcaca libg++ linguas_en logrotate lzo mad matroska mikmod mjpeg mmx mmx2 mmxext modplug motif mp3 mpeg musepack musicbrainz ncurses nls nojoystick nptl nptlonly ogg opengl oss pam pcre pdf perl pic png ppds pppd python qt qt3 quicktime readline real reflection scanner sdl session smime sndfile spell spl sse sse2 sse3 ssl svg svga tcl tcpd theora tiff timidity tk truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userland_GNU utempter vcd video_cards_i810 video_cards_vesa vidix vorbis win32codecs wma x264 xcomposite xforms xine xml xorg xv xvid xvmc zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS


EDIT: Ok it was my fault. I updated binutils from portage and it screwed everything up. The whole toolchain broke but thanks to god I recovered :D


Last edited by abhay on Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:17 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
S. Traaken
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Nov 2003
Posts: 135

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nxsty wrote:
If it has the 1.3 (2.5) or 2.4 (2.5.90) extra patches it´s up to date.


Should that be 1.4 for 2.5.90? Because that's what I appear to have.

I was hoping there was a fix for getting binutils built with bdirect on amd64.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlphaHeX
n00b
n00b


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 60
Location: Warsaw, Poland

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:29 pm    Post subject: extra paches for glibc Reply with quote

I would like to ask for a changelog of extra patches for glibc. You have indeed updated extra patches for glibc to 1.3 but what was changed since last version is unknown :( Do I have to reemerge glibc or even world in such case ?
_________________
HP Pavilion HDX9494NR [Intel Core 2 Duo X9000 | 20.1" Wide SXGA+ | 8GB Memory | 120 SSD + 500 HDD 7200rpm | Blu-ray Disc / Super Multi | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nxsty
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

S. Traaken wrote:
nxsty wrote:
If it has the 1.3 (2.5) or 2.4 (2.5.90) extra patches it´s up to date.


Should that be 1.4 for 2.5.90? Because that's what I appear to have.

I was hoping there was a fix for getting binutils built with bdirect on amd64.


Yea, 1.4 is the correct.

I'm going to try solving the binutils problem when I update it to the new version sometime soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nxsty
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 1556
Location: .se

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:37 pm    Post subject: Re: extra paches for glibc Reply with quote

AlphaHeX wrote:
I would like to ask for a changelog of extra patches for glibc. You have indeed updated extra patches for glibc to 1.3 but what was changed since last version is unknown :( Do I have to reemerge glibc or even world in such case ?


Actually only the -Bdirect patch is new so you don´t need to recompile anything. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlphaHeX
n00b
n00b


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 60
Location: Warsaw, Poland

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nxsty what is the current status of -Bdirect patch? Is it working with hash-style? And finally what is the future of -Bdirect patch? Is that patch going to be still developed or it will be dropped?
_________________
HP Pavilion HDX9494NR [Intel Core 2 Duo X9000 | 20.1" Wide SXGA+ | 8GB Memory | 120 SSD + 500 HDD 7200rpm | Blu-ray Disc / Super Multi | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, I also second the question above. And, my "invalid out-of-map direct binding" errors are back, I think this happened after prelinking. Not all of them, though, e.g. _finalize doesn't appear now, but many others do, like strcpy, fwrite etc. :cry: :cry:
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, it's a prelink error, disappeared after I've undone prelinking. Can't get more details, apparingly there are some specific symbols affected. I was prelinking in a forced mode, prelink -avmRhf, now I'm going to try omitting -f and see what happens.
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no, it's not caused by -f switch..
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zedou42
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I tried to compile the new Glibc but during the compilation I got this fatal error:

Code:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5.90.20061022/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/iconv/charmap.o', needed by `others'.  Stop.
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5.90.20061022/work/glibc-2.5/iconv'
make[1]: *** [iconv/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5.90.20061022/work/glibc-2.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.5.90.20061022 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1568:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 937:   Called src_compile
  glibc-2.5.90.20061022.ebuild, line 1157:   Called toolchain-glibc_src_compile
  glibc-2.5.90.20061022.ebuild, line 261:   Called die


Any idea?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nowinter
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 3:24 am    Post subject: bdirect USE flag makes binutils-2.17.50.5 emerge fail Reply with quote

Without the flag, it compiles smoothly..
Emerge log tail (it gets pretty far compiling, bfdsort.c is what makes it finally fail):

/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O0 -march=pentium4 -pipe -c -o simple.lo /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/simple.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O0 -march=pentium4 -pipe -c /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/simple.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/simple.o
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O0 -march=pentium4 -pipe -c /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/simple.c -o simple.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O0 -march=pentium4 -pipe -c -o bfdsort.lo /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd -I/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -O0 -march=pentium4 -pipe -c /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/bfdsort.o
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:96: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'bfd_qsort_closure_func'
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:97: warning: no previous prototype for 'bfd_qsort'
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c: In function 'bfd_qsort':
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:128: error: 'cmp' undeclared (first use in this function)
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/bfd/bfdsort.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[4]: *** [bfdsort.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build/bfd'
make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.17.50.0.5/work/build'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.5 failed.

I didn't understand the error.. :roll:
_________________
All In All Is All We All Are
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ryszardzonk
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 182
Location: Rzeszów, POLAND

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:48 pm    Post subject: Am I crazy???? Reply with quote

I just tried to play with the ebuilds for the little wild and this is what I come up with.

1) I tried to get new binutils to merge with bidirect flag, however unsuccesfully. then I tried to use it with just a bidirect patch and not the hash+dynsort patch. It failed co merge as well
2) What I tried to merge binutils with bidirect+hashvals patch only (not dynsort) and it merged properly !!! Using just a -Wl,-hashvals produced gcc error in configure that in can not create executables, but what I found out is that placing -Wl,-Bdirect and -Wl,--hash-style=both WORKED! Either I am insane and it is just my sight playing tricks on me or I have it acctually working (Bdirect and new hashvals patch)
3) I am not sure if this is important, but what I did is emerged the toolchain first without old hashlvals and then tried to emerge it with the new ne and it worked. I am almost at the end of emerge world and yet to see a problem

4) I am not sure if plain ebuild from nxsty would work as I added extra OpenSuse patches. If the would be someone that can take further look at it and say why those patches are not in the Gentoo patchset it would be great.
Ebuilds I used
http://bigvo.dyndns.org/binutils.tar.bz2
http://bigvo.dyndns.org/glibc.tar.bz2
_________________
Sky is not the limit...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nirax
Guru
Guru


Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 319
Location: Germany, old Europe

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

when i try to emerge the last toolchain overlay, it seems to depend on new previously masked by keyword kernelheaders.
why are these necessary, and what do i have to recompile after the new binutils, glibc and kernel headers ?
the compelte system ?

ps: im on amd64
currently installed arE:
sys-devel/binutils-2.17 from toolchain overlay
glibc from toolchain overlay 2.4-r3
and stock gentoo-sources 2.6.17-gentoo-r8

greets and thanks for the great work,
nirax
_________________
quot licet iovi non licet bovi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 28, 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 29 of 31

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum