| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
putzmanjr19
n00b
Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 21
|
 Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 8:01 pm Post subject: Emerge Samba problem |
 |
|
Hi all,
I've been trying to emerge samba on my PII 266mhz box and have been having some problems. All of the dependencies (cups, etc) compiled without problems (as almost all of the other things I've compiled seem to do). When emerging Samba, however, it gets to a point where it repeats:
| Code: | | audit.o.lock waiting to be removed |
and it does this over and over again until I kill the emerge.
I have read posts about this and found one which involved the same problem, but the poster figured that he had put a zero instead of an O in O3 in make.conf. This is not my problem and I have also tried all of the other solutions in that thread.
I usually use distcc and I've tried it with and without. I've changed my optimizations from O3 to O2. Nothing I do seems to have any effect on the problem at all. It emerged fine on my 1.4 ghz athlon, but on my server it isn't working so well. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
putzmanjr19 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sebgarden
Guru
Joined: 21 Dec 2002
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2003 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello putzmanger19,
I had a similar problem of compilation, well, not the same but the compilation of samba-3.0_alpaha24-r1 failed at some point. It helped for me to lower my cflags (-march=pentium3 -O2 -pipe worked). Just try it too, I hope this helps.
Regards,
Sébastien. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
putzmanjr19
n00b
Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2003 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've tried -O2, but I guess I can try lower. It doesn't look like a problem dealing with optimizations, but rather a loop because some file isn't being removed correctly. Thanks for the help as I will keep lowering the optimizations and see if it makes a difference.
putzmanjr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sebgarden
Guru
Joined: 21 Dec 2002
Posts: 353
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2003 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hum, I guess compiling with -march=x86 is not a way to solve the problem but you can try in order to say: now I'm sure the problem is not here. Otherwise, you can fill in a bug report in bugs.gentoo.org.
Regards,
Sébastien. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Portage & Programming
