Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Getting portage running under Solaris 9 (Portaris!)
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Vestec
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
Location: Central Europe

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

quite a better news :-)
I will respond soon...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vestec
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
Location: Central Europe

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Small :-) summary.
After running the edited script (mkheaders) there were error in following cases:
flex, bison, binutils, gawk, db, gdbm, texinfo, perl, XML-Parser, python, automake, libtool. (www.truni.sk/portage-emerge.log)
Editing vars in make.conf:
Quote:
CHOST="sparc-sun-solaris2.9"
ARCH="sun"
CFLAGS="-mcpu=ultrasparc -O3 -pipe"

and emerging errored utilities as written in the script --> errors were produced only in four cases: texinfo, python, automake, libtool.
texinfo:
Quote:
gcc -mcpu=ultrasparc -O3 -pipe -L/opt/portage/usr/lib -o makedoc makedoc.o ../lib/libtxi.a -lcurses ../intl/libintl.a /opt/portage/usr/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/opt/portage/usr/lib
gcc: ../intl/libintl.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [makedoc] Error 1
make: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/texinfo-4.8/work/texinfo-4.8/info'

!!! ERROR: sys-apps/texinfo-4.8 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 44, Exitcode 2
!!! emake makedoc
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

and python:
Quote:
gcc -c -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -mcpu=ultrasparc -O3 -pipe -I. -I./Include -fPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Objects/complexobject.o Objects/complexobject.c
Objects/complexobject.c: In function `complex_pow':
Objects/complexobject.c:469: error: invalid operands to binary ==
Objects/complexobject.c:469: error: wrong type argument to unary minus
Objects/complexobject.c:469: error: invalid operands to binary ==
Objects/complexobject.c:469: error: wrong type argument to unary minus
make: *** [Objects/complexobject.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

!!! ERROR: dev-lang/python-2.3.5 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 134, Exitcode 2
!!! Parallel make failed

then automake:
Quote:
configure: WARNING: In the future, Autoconf will not detect cross-tools
whose name does not start with the host triplet. If you think this
configuration is useful to you, please write to autoconf@gnu.org.
checking for perl... /bin/perl
checking for tex... no
checking whether autoconf is installed... no
configure: error: Autoconf 2.58 or better is required.
Please make sure it is installed and in your PATH.

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/automake-1.9.4 failed.
!!! Function econf, Line 441, Exitcode 1

However, the autoconf utility is installed:
Quote:
bash-3.00# emerge -s autoconf
Searching...
[ Results for search key : autoconf ]
[ Applications found : 5 ]

* sys-devel/autoconf
Latest version available: 2.59-r6
Latest version installed: 2.59-r6
Size of downloaded files: 903 kB
Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/autoconf.html
Description: Used to create autoconfiguration files
License: GPL-2

I have found the autoconf utility PATH:
Quote:
bash-3.00# find / -name autoconf
/usr/share/autoconf
/usr/share/autoconf/autoconf
^C

and have added the PATH
Quote:
bash-3.00# echo $PATH
/opt/portage/usr/bin:/opt/portage/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/etc:.
bash-3.00# export PATH=/usr/share/autoconf/autoconf:$PATH
bash-3.00# echo $PATH
/usr/share/autoconf/autoconf:/opt/portage/usr/bin:/opt/portage/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/etc:.

but the error appeared again.
and the last - libtool (part of the "makefile tools" set):
Quote:
* Running autotools in '.'...
/usr/portage/sys-devel/libtool/libtool-1.5.16.ebuild: line 124: aclocal: command not found

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.16 failed.
!!! Function src_unpack, Line 124, Exitcode 127
!!! aclocal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devsk
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 2726
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
emerge -pv autoconf automake

if its mostly autoconf/make related packages, just do
Code:
emerge autoconf automake


this is a known issue where wrappers and other parts of the autoconf/make are not installed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vestec
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 24
Location: Central Europe

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2005 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
emerge -pv autoconf automake

Quote:

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=sys-devel/automake-1.5*" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-devel/automake-1.5 (masked by: profile)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
section 2.2 "Software Availability" in the Gentoo Handbook.
!!! (dependency required by "sys-devel/automake-wrapper-1-r1" [ebuild])


Code:
emerge -pv autoconf

Quote:

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/texinfo-4.8 -build -debug +nls -static 0 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.13 433 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-devel/autoconf-wrapper-2-r1 0 kB
[ebuild R ] sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r6 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 433 kB

Code:
emerge autoconf

Quote:
gcc: ../intl/libintl.a: No such file or directory
make: *** [makedoc] Error 1
make: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/texinfo-4.8/work/texinfo-4.8/info'

!!! ERROR: sys-apps/texinfo-4.8 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 44, Exitcode 2
!!! emake makedoc
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.


I have added /usr/lib into .profile LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Having emerged autoconf-wrapper and automake-wrapper first I have successfully emerge automake then. :-)
then also libtool has been successfully emerged
So only texinfo and python have not been successfully emerged. While I have a fully functional "Solaris python", the texinfo remains I have tried to emerge mc and smack my head against S-Lang :-):
Quote:
checking for SLang_init_tty in -lslang... no
configure: error: S-Lang library not found

!!! ERROR: app-misc/mc-4.6.0-r13 failed.
!!! Function econf, Line 441, Exitcode 1
!!! econf failed

I have found some things in the forums.gentoo http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-330031-highlight-slang.html which led me to emerge:
sys-libs/slang --> to no avail
emerge dev-libs/libunicode --> to no avail
I have tried
Code:
env-update
--> to no avail.
For the reference:
Quote:
bash-3.00# emerge info
Portage 2.0.51_rc1 (default-sun-9.0, gcc-3.4.3, unavailable, 5.10 sun4u)
=================================================================
System uname: 5.10 sun4u sparc
Gentoo-Solaris Base System version 2004.0 (Portaris 1.0), Gentoo Foundation Inc.
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r6
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.9.4
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.15.92.0.2-r7
Headers:
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.16
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="sparc"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-mcpu=ultrasparc -O3 -pipe"
CHOST="sparc-sun-solaris2.9"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/ config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.ynet.sk/pub http://gentoo.osuosl.org http://www.ib iblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X arts berkdb crypt cups foomaticdb gdbm gnome gtk gtk2 imlib jpeg kde libw ww mad mikmod motif mpeg ncurses nls opengl pam perl png python qt readline slan g solaris sparc spell ssl sun tcpd truetype xv zlib"


Last edited by Vestec on Wed May 04, 2005 10:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nudzoo
n00b
n00b


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 1:46 pm    Post subject: Almost running... Reply with quote

I've got many things runnig on Solaris 10... I'm trying to remove all dependencie on /opt/portage... I made my own rule to have libiconv and gettext in /usr/gnu and I'll preparing ebuilds to get this libs installed here. Next need is ncurses, coreutils, fingutils, grep... may be more in this directory. I don't want break solaris bins, so that's the meaning of /usr/gnu dir for me.

I'll write something more in the future... Appointment for those trying too: there is problem in many places with -ldl -lc linker flags... I've discovered, that Sol10 don't need this to make working shared libraries and more, Sol10 + binutils +gcc hate this. If you see dlopen@... dlclose@... unresolved symbols in linking, this is the one problem.

Stay tuned...:)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Curtm4n
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that OpenSolaris is finally released, what do you guys think the possibility of bootstrapping it from in Linux/Gentoo?

I've been poking around trying to see how to do it, but it seems non trivial.
I'm guessing what would need to be done, is to build Sun's libc with gcc then build a cross compiler to build the kernel, and rebuild libc.

Anyone else interested in this?

It would be very nice to be able to bootstrap OpenSolaris without needing their binary utilities. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gecklord
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be even nicer to get this done with sun's cc!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Curtm4n
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Nov 2004
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gecklord wrote:
It would be even nicer to get this done with sun's cc!


Sadly, Sun's cc isn't open/free software. Sun claims that OpenSolaris can be built with GCC, so that seems like the best route to start with.

Sun's CC would be great a secondary goal, but doesn't interest me all that much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tarpon
n00b
n00b


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:31 pm    Post subject: Sun's CC is free Reply with quote

I read on the OpenSolaris site that Sun's compiler is free.

Get yours here http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devsk
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 2726
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Curtm4n wrote:
Gecklord wrote:
It would be even nicer to get this done with sun's cc!


Sadly, Sun's cc isn't open/free software. Sun claims that OpenSolaris can be built with GCC, so that seems like the best route to start with.

Sun's CC would be great a secondary goal, but doesn't interest me all that much.
there are gcc patches discussed in a blog sometime back, but I think they haven't released the source as yet. Ultimately (and sooner) opensolaris has to support 'all-gcc' setup. sun studio may be free, but I think getting packages to build with sun studio has been a royal pain. Although I did manage to build a fair amount of them with sun compilers using portage, but overall, I will stick with gcc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gecklord
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi devsk!

Do you make some progress with portage & opensolaris?
By the end of june I will have done all exams (university) and will be ready to do some testing if needed!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devsk
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 2726
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gecklord wrote:
Hi devsk!

Do you make some progress with portage & opensolaris?

no, not as yet. but will soon(most likely by mid to end july).
Gecklord wrote:

By the end of june I will have done all exams (university) and will be ready to do some testing if needed!
I will keep you posted. thanks for offering!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96140
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just got my Solaris 10 CDs (for x86) and plan to install sometime in the next week or so. Once that happens, I'd love to help out with Gentoo/Solaris. That is, if development will include Solaris 10. Or are you going to be using OpenSolaris as the base platform?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devsk
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 2726
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightmorph wrote:
I just got my Solaris 10 CDs (for x86) and plan to install sometime in the next week or so. Once that happens, I'd love to help out with Gentoo/Solaris. That is, if development will include Solaris 10. Or are you going to be using OpenSolaris as the base platform?


zones is a life saver when it comes to testing. I have been testing various things with portage in its own zone. The problem with 10 is that it already comes with lot of stuff that is GNU, but it is not in /usr but in /usr/sfw. That makes portage not like those packages. And if portage were to emerge those packages, they will be going into /usr and hence creating duplicates (all kinds of problems with half the things linked against /usr/lib and others linked against /usr/sfw/lib). The only possibility I am seeing to tackle this is that portage also need to talk to native pkg management system. The progress is still not worth releasing to public because I still haven't figured many of the native package mgmt APIs and I haven't formalised all the steps that I had to take (although I have kept notes of all).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96140
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

devsk wrote:
The progress is still not worth releasing to public because I still haven't figured many of the native package mgmt APIs and I haven't formalised all the steps that I had to take (although I have kept notes of all).

Are you talking about the package management built into Solaris itself, or other alternatives?

I just took a look at this community website, and they have their own package management tool (pkg-get) that might be looking into. It seems to handle mostly binaries, but there might be something to it, after all. Something you might borrow from, at any rate. According to the pkg-get howto, anything from blastwave is placed in /opt/csw, so it will not interfere with anything else in Solaris.

It's just a blind suggestion, but is this at all possible with Portaris: just stick anything that Portage emerges in /opt/csw (or equivalent), or is it a better idea to use existing components of Solaris in spite of where they're placed? (for example, the included gcc)

I mean, there's got to be a way to just add a few more lines to Portage that tell it to place everything in /opt/csw, rather like how apps like firefox-bin (and similar) get placed into /opt on Gentoo. Unless it's not that easy....I confess, I'm still trying to learn the subtleties of ciaranm's developer handbook.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devsk
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 2726
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightmorph wrote:
devsk wrote:
The progress is still not worth releasing to public because I still haven't figured many of the native package mgmt APIs and I haven't formalised all the steps that I had to take (although I have kept notes of all).

Are you talking about the package management built into Solaris itself, or other alternatives?

I just took a look at this community website, and they have their own package management tool (pkg-get) that might be looking into. It seems to handle mostly binaries, but there might be something to it, after all. Something you might borrow from, at any rate. According to the pkg-get howto, anything from blastwave is placed in /opt/csw, so it will not interfere with anything else in Solaris.

It's just a blind suggestion, but is this at all possible with Portaris: just stick anything that Portage emerges in /opt/csw (or equivalent), or is it a better idea to use existing components of Solaris in spite of where they're placed? (for example, the included gcc)

I mean, there's got to be a way to just add a few more lines to Portage that tell it to place everything in /opt/csw, rather like how apps like firefox-bin (and similar) get placed into /opt on Gentoo. Unless it's not that easy....I confess, I'm still trying to learn the subtleties of ciaranm's developer handbook.


pkg-get uses the solaris package management backend (pkgadd/pkgrm) and provides functinality similar to apt-get by resolving dependencies etc. The problem with pkg-get is that it builds a parallel stack of GNU software in /opt/csw and hence leading to the same duplicates problem as I described.

The portage tries to be FHS compliant and tries to be the only pkg mgmt on the whole system. It was not designed to be installing software in anything other than /usr. Typically, you will need to change thousands of ebuilds and lot of python code inside portage to install in anything other than /usr. This will be a major undertaking and I don't think anyone's even thinking about it much after pathspec didn't go anywhere.

So, once you decide to use portage on opensolaris, it will BE your pkg mgmt frontend and it will have to interact with pkgadd/pkgrm to give you a unified picture of the software on your solaris machine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ramereth
Developer
Developer


Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 12
Location: Corvallis, OR USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is there an actual site for portaris? All I've seen so far is rouge links to forum threads which make it very hard to see how this project/idea is moving along. I've just recently started gaining interest in this and would like to see how I might help it along if i think its a good thing to try.

Cheers-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gecklord
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd love to get some infos about the progress, too!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
devsk
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 2726
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gecklord wrote:
I'd love to get some infos about the progress, too!
there is no progress beyond what I reported on OS forums (that I have a zone where portage works nicely but you can't really do that in the global zone). I have stopped work on portage on solaris because of lack of resources ("no machine left") and support...solaris 10 (hence opensolaris) is much more messier than solaris 9 because of default GNU installs in /usr and /usr/sfw and the only option I see now is to take a minimal distro like schillix and work with it. My problem is that I am already tripple booting the machine I have and have no space left on it. So, I am kinda stuck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lucractius
n00b
n00b


Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 43
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if my box had more room id try dual booting to this but ive only got 8 gig on it :(

Anyone got a disk to loan devsk? see if we can get him some help perhaps :) its probably to much to ship anything from where i am and i dont got any spare parts but im sure theres people closer to him interested in loaning or donating parts to getting this project further developed :)

Portaris is somewhere Gentoo should be going and from the size of this thread then its got a fair few fans, it shouldnt stagnate and fade away cause of something like this!

If i had an easy way to send some help i would. But im in Australia with $0 in my pay pal right now :( so itd cost half the money i have spare to send him the other half :(

Any other offers of support :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marcion
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 158
Location: England

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:04 pm    Post subject: Portaris Hompage Reply with quote

ramereth wrote:
Is there an actual site for portaris? All I've seen so far is rouge links to forum threads which make it very hard to see how this project/idea is moving along. I've just recently started gaining interest in this and would like to see how I might help it along if i think its a good thing to try.

Cheers-


http://www.portaris.org - Knock yourself out!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stonent
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 07 Aug 2003
Posts: 1139
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:57 am    Post subject: Re: Portaris Hompage Reply with quote

marcion wrote:
ramereth wrote:
Is there an actual site for portaris? All I've seen so far is rouge links to forum threads which make it very hard to see how this project/idea is moving along. I've just recently started gaining interest in this and would like to see how I might help it along if i think its a good thing to try.

Cheers-


http://www.portaris.org - Knock yourself out!


For the record. I don't have anything to do with that site. In fact I haven't booted Solaris in over a year. I've got way too much stuff going on right now for me to mess with it any more.
_________________
Inspiron 4100 & Sun UltraAXe
Portage on Solaris|Dell Laptop Hacks
The way you feel about organized religion is the same way I feel about organized socialism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
feliperal
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about resurrecting this project!

If anyone is interested on getting gentoofying and gnuifying the solaris 10 (opensolaris), please msg me. Right now, I just want to get this working as a proof of concept.

I'm currently working on building the opensolaris bits and bootstrapping the gcc compiler. I'll try to write down my steps for anyone who is interested in following them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Karaca
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 20
Location: Frankfurt (M) / Germany

PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
How about resurrecting this project!

If anyone is interested on getting gentoofying and gnuifying the solaris 10 (opensolaris), please msg me. Right now, I just want to get this working as a proof of concept.

I'm currently working on building the opensolaris bits and bootstrapping the gcc compiler. I'll try to write down my steps for anyone who is interested in following them.


Hi,

great Idea!

I'm currently experimenting with LFS. After that i want to experiment with "Solaris From Stratch" :twisted:

I don't know if it works but i'm kinda bored nowadays :?
Maybe you can write a small How-To about bootstrapping Solaris.

By the way i think using Nexanta as host would be easier for you.

Have a nice Weekend ...
_________________
"... don't wait for the good woman. She doesn't exist. There are women who can make you feel more with their bodies and their souls but these are the exact women who will turn the knife into you right in front of the crowd."
-- Henry Charles Bukowski
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
renihs
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Location: Austria, Vienna

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

me would join this project too :)

some nice opensolaris livecds/dvds would be nice, with zfs, zones, xgl and other (crazy) nice stuff
_________________
Gentoos are the fastest underwater swimming birds, reaching speeds of 36 km/h (22.3 mph).
Height: 75cm (29in), Weight: 5.5kg
If you discover spelling errors, you are authorized to keep them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo on Alternative Architectures All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
Page 12 of 13

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum