| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sith_Happens Veteran


Joined: 15 Dec 2004 Posts: 1807 Location: The University of Maryland at College Park
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Clyde wrote: | | Bob P wrote: | one thing that i have noticed when looking over the statistics on our server is that the majority of the users are NOT downloading the MD5 files to verify that the ISO are properly transmitted. after you download the ISO, its absolutely essential to verify its integrity. i'm at a loss to explain why everyone seems to be skipping that step.
|
One reason may be the way that n00bs (like myself) tend to use your website's .md5 hyperlinks to get an .md5 file: by using Windows/IE, which makes it all too easy to save it as a bunch of html, and/or with the wrong filename, etc. Then a subset of us have to find and download a Windows md5sum.exe and know to run it with a -c parm.  | The people who download from windows make up about half of the total visitors, so that is no small subset. _________________ "That question was less stupid; though you asked it in a profoundly stupid way."
I'm the brains behind Jackass! | Tutorials: Shorewall |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MIRROR ANNOUNCEMENT:
We are happy to announce that we have had two web hosts volunteer their service in support of Open Source Software Development by acting as file-download mirrors for The Jackass! Project.
Two Authorized Download Mirrors for The Jackass! Project went on-line today. At present, Jackass! is being hosted on three download mirrors that have very fat pipes.
I would like to acknowledge the following people who have been generous enough to provide file hosting services for the project. The new mirrors are administrated by Eric Davis and James Dio.
| Code: |
Host: URL: Location: Notes:
---------- ------------------------------ --------- -------------------------------------------
Eric Davis http://compuextreme.com USA - CA Free Hosting Plans for Open Source projects
James Dio http://psunit.com USA - NJ PS-Unit Mirror for OSS Projects
Ryan Lynch http://bluebox.student.umd.edu USA - MD Jackass! Project Development Team
|
To facilitate finding the files on the mirrors, The Jackass! Project website at http://jackass.homelinux.org has direct download links to the mirrored files on its download page.
We are still looking for additional mirrors to support distribution of The Jackass! Project. If you would be interested in supporting OSSD by providing a mirror for The Jackass! Project, please send me a Personal Message via the Gentoo Forums. Optimally, we would like to add an additional USA mirror (preferably in the Midwest) and a European mirror.
Thanks! _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clyde n00b

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 15 Location: Greenville, SC
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 6:49 pm Post subject: n00b-oriented questions/comments |
|
|
Some extremely minor nitpicks about a very impressive and useful project:
1. As a n00b trying to learn the purpose of each little detail, component, configuration setting, etc. in a system as I build it, I can refer back to the Gentoo Install Handbook to understand why the Jackass install guide (section 7.2 "Emerge Services") emerges syslog-ng, grub, vixie-cron, reiserfsprogs, and dhcpcd. And although they're not specifically mentioned in the GIH, it's fairly intuitive to guess why Jackass also emerges sysfsutils, hotplug, coldplug, gentoolkit, acpid and ntp. But I have no easy way to divine why it emerges xinetd. Is it just a commonly used but noncritical option?
2. Similar to #1, is adding sshd to the default runlevel a common but noncritical option?
3. The Jackass install guide says that [compared to fiddling with CFLAGS], "the most powerful method of optimizing Gentoo lies in the area of USE flags." But aside from the nptl issue, it avoids making any comments on the relative usefulness of all the USE flags included in the standard base layout. Any n00b browsing the forums quickly learns that USE flags are poorly documented and a contentious topic. But some general guidance from the Jackass dev team would be extremely helpful. For example, since Jackass includes acpid (see #1 above), why is the acpi USE flag not also used?
4. Since resyncing after install is said to be such a crapshoot, it might be useful to incorporate heilvc's, MindEraser's or some similar update script into future iso's, or at least described the install guide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geministorm n00b


Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 50 Location: Melbourne, FL USA
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob, et al.;
Fantastic job people! A very professional ISO, I'm quite impressed that this was put together so quickly and so well done. Not at all what I expected from a group distanced by physical space and with real lives to lead (on the side? ).
I started the install this afternoon after successfully finishing the 1/3 method (lordy, that's a lot of compiling), re-partitioned everything, and was going to do the install via Knoppix, but after reading Bob's post about different media, I decided to differ to the experts...
Small comment/nit and some questions;
Comment: During the network setup, I needed to create the /etc/resolv.conf file using vi. No issue what-so-ever with that (I'm used to setting up configs by hand, enjoy it actually), but for the sake of completeness, the manual describes copying over the file to the Gentoo/Jackass! environment later (6.1 Copy DNS Information). I know you shouldn't need to hand-hold everyone through their unique network setup, and that you must assume that anyone using this methodology is proficient to some degree with Linux....I'm just suggesting this for the sake of logic.
Question #1: During the 1/3 installation and also when I did the Gentoo Stage 1, 2 & 3 installs, I had issues with svgalibs and alsa-drivers wanted a configured and compiled kernel on the system already. The fix mentioned in the forums did not solve the problem so I needed to either do a;
| Code: | | USE="-svgalibs -alsa" emerge --resume |
or, emerge, configure and compile the kernel at that point. I choose the second option. I also decided that emerging CCACHE prior to the "emerge -e system && emerge -e system" would prove beneficial.
Do you see any problem with doing this during the Jackass! installation (in other words, going out of sequence)....I'll take my answer offline as I duck out of the way of any flying projectiles.
Question #2: Removed after actually reading the documentation (7.1 Emerge Ccache)
Question #3: I went with 2GB CCACHE. I have the following partition setup;
/dev/sda5 +100M /boot
/dev/sda6 +512M swap
/dev/sda7 +8000M /
/dev/sda8 +4000M /var
/dev/sda9 +12000M /home
/dev/sda10 +24000M /usr
See any problems that might crop up space-wise with this?
Thanks Jackasses! I'll update as I get further along the install process. _________________ Abit NF7-S (Realtek RTL8201, RTL8801b, ALC650, SiL3112a)
1GB (2x 512MB) DDR400, dual-channel
AMD 2500+ (Barton) XP (@10x200)
200GB Maxtor SATA
120GB Maxtor U-ATA
45GB IBM U-ATA
Plextor PX-712 DVD+/-RW
AOpen 16x DVD
OS: Gentoo/WinXP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sade Guru


Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 406 Location: Netherlands - Eindhoven
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 10:51 am Post subject: Re: n00b-oriented questions/comments |
|
|
| Clyde wrote: | Some extremely minor nitpicks about a very impressive and useful project:
1. As a n00b trying to learn the purpose of each little detail, component, configuration setting, etc. in a system as I build it, I can refer back to the Gentoo Install Handbook to understand why the Jackass install guide (section 7.2 "Emerge Services") emerges syslog-ng, grub, vixie-cron, reiserfsprogs, and dhcpcd. And although they're not specifically mentioned in the GIH, it's fairly intuitive to guess why Jackass also emerges sysfsutils, hotplug, coldplug, gentoolkit, acpid and ntp. But I have no easy way to divine why it emerges xinetd. Is it just a commonly used but noncritical option?
2. Similar to #1, is adding sshd to the default runlevel a common but noncritical option?
3. The Jackass install guide says that [compared to fiddling with CFLAGS], "the most powerful method of optimizing Gentoo lies in the area of USE flags." But aside from the nptl issue, it avoids making any comments on the relative usefulness of all the USE flags included in the standard base layout. Any n00b browsing the forums quickly learns that USE flags are poorly documented and a contentious topic. But some general guidance from the Jackass dev team would be extremely helpful. For example, since Jackass includes acpid (see #1 above), why is the acpi USE flag not also used?
4. Since resyncing after install is said to be such a crapshoot, it might be useful to incorporate heilvc's, MindEraser's or some similar update script into future iso's, or at least described the install guide. |
The difficulty of each project is to set a scope, and to stick with it.
The scope of this project was to enlight the compiling-time of a stage1/3 install
And the scope of the stage1/3 install was a install method for more advanced users.
Mayb one can answer your four questions here, but i think they don't belong in this topic.
I also think bob will agree with me on this one.
Nevertheless i think these are good questions to ask yourself but this just isn't the place. _________________ | 1.6Ghz atom N270 | adopt an unanswerd post | a nice way to post a config file | |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sade Guru


Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 406 Location: Netherlands - Eindhoven
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Geministorm wrote: | Question #3: I went with 2GB CCACHE. I have the following partition setup;
/dev/sda5 +100M /boot
/dev/sda6 +512M swap
/dev/sda7 +8000M /
/dev/sda8 +4000M /var
/dev/sda9 +12000M /home
/dev/sda10 +24000M /usr
See any problems that might crop up space-wise with this? |
i can't realy answer your first questions because i don't know the answers.
this one i can answer: i have a 8Gb root partition, and a 2Gb ccache and it doesn't fill up. And i don't even have a /var and /usr partition.
but if in trouble u can always move the ccache to a different partition if you want to. check the /etc/make.conf.example for how to do this. _________________ | 1.6Ghz atom N270 | adopt an unanswerd post | a nice way to post a config file | |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Geministorm n00b


Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 50 Location: Melbourne, FL USA
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob P, et al;
Wonderful!
I want to say that the Jackass! install finished and I was up and running sooner than I expected, and the manual is "spot on".
I know this is the Support Forum for Jackass!, but I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate all the effort put forth by the Jackass! team. You guys did a marvelous job.
kudos! _________________ Abit NF7-S (Realtek RTL8201, RTL8801b, ALC650, SiL3112a)
1GB (2x 512MB) DDR400, dual-channel
AMD 2500+ (Barton) XP (@10x200)
200GB Maxtor SATA
120GB Maxtor U-ATA
45GB IBM U-ATA
Plextor PX-712 DVD+/-RW
AOpen 16x DVD
OS: Gentoo/WinXP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
todw1fd Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 21 Mar 2003 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
strange problem with sfdisk reporting seek errors and unrecognized partition table type. Found a post on the web saying there was a problem with compiling util-linux using gcc 3.4 that leads to these errors. Could anyone else using Jackass verify that they also have the same problems? Here's a link to my original post in the Kernel forum:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-339197.html
Just running sfdisk -l should show you if this problem affects us all or for some reason just me.
fdisk and cfdisk work just fine, so not a showstopper. Just wanted to dump my partition tables out for backup sake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| todw1fd wrote: | strange problem with sfdisk reporting seek errors and unrecognized partition table type. Found a post on the web saying there was a problem with compiling util-linux using gcc 3.4 that leads to these errors. Could anyone else using Jackass verify that they also have the same problems? Here's a link to my original post in the Kernel forum:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-339197.html
Just running sfdisk -l should show you if this problem affects us all or for some reason just me.
fdisk and cfdisk work just fine, so not a showstopper. Just wanted to dump my partition tables out for backup sake. |
fwiw, one of our testers (obsidianblackhawk) uses sfdisk exclusively. he's tested every single tarball in the Jackass project with sfdisk. maybe he can shed a little light on the issue.
with that said, if sfdisk is causing problems for you and you've found a reason why its not supposed to work with gcc 343, then i wouldn't recommend using it to partition your disk! if you haven't done so already, you need to file a bug report with bugzilla.
fdisk is the program that is recommended in the Jackass! Installation Manual. we support the install with it, and it works fine.
fwiw, this is not a jackass-specific issue. this is an ebuild issue. because there is nothing that we can do about an ebuild problem, it really needs to be reported via bugzilla.  _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Geministorm wrote: | Question #1: During the 1/3 installation and also when I did the Gentoo Stage 1, 2 & 3 installs, I had issues with svgalibs and alsa-drivers wanted a configured and compiled kernel on the system already. The fix mentioned in the forums did not solve the problem so I needed to either do a;
| Code: | | USE="-svgalibs -alsa" emerge --resume |
or, emerge, configure and compile the kernel at that point. I choose the second option. I also decided that emerging CCACHE prior to the "emerge -e system && emerge -e system" would prove beneficial.
Do you see any problem with doing this during the Jackass! installation (in other words, going out of sequence)....I'll take my answer offline as I duck out of the way of any flying projectiles.
Question #2: Removed after actually reading the documentation (7.1 Emerge Ccache)
|
thanks for the kind words.
1. i kind of hate to say this in reply, but Jackass! and the Stage 1/3 install focus on building the system toolkit, and they don't cover hardware configuration issues like problems with svgalibs and alsa. so i'm going to have to cop-out and say that those topics are beyond the scope of the Project. i'd recommend that you follow-up on those in Kernel & Hardware.
that said, there are some packages that have to be emerged AFTER the kernel is emerged, as they are dependent upon it. you have absoluetly no hope of getting those programs to work if you emerge them before your kernel. this is particularly true of audio / video hardware that is dependent upon kernel drivers.
this shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, as these packages typically try to emerge the kernel as a dependency, and you have to manually override that action to get the programs to install.
these concepts are Gentoo Fundamentals that everyone needs to be aware of. if you look at the JIH you'll see an example that splashutils is emerged after the kernel, instead of with the rest of the world packages.
2. yes, reading the manual always helps. what you're supposed to do when installing is read the manual, and follow it dogmatically. this means that you perform the steps listed, and only the steps listed. you can add other packages AFTER you complete the install. you shouldn't add other packages, such as audio / video packages, until all of the steps in the install have been completed. _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Please Note:
The Jackass! Project and the Stage 1/3 Installation Method for Gentoo 2005.0 have their own support threads. My Personal Message box should NOT be used to solicit support for either of these projects.
Please post all Jackass! support requests to the Jackass! Support Group.
Please post all Stage 1/3 support requests to the Stage 1/3 Support Thread.
Please note that I will not repond to ANY Personal Messages requesting support for the Stage 1 on 3 Installation Guide or for the Jackass! Project . All Personal Messages sent to me that contain personalized support requests will be deleted without a reply.
Please post ALL support requests to the Official Support Threads, where everyone can benefit from the answers!  _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
todw1fd Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 21 Mar 2003 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | with that said, if sfdisk is causing problems for you and you've found a reason why its not supposed to work with gcc 343, then i wouldn't recommend using it to partition your disk! if you haven't done so already, you need to file a bug report with bugzilla.
fdisk is the program that is recommended in the Jackass! Installation Manual. we support the install with it, and it works fine.
fwiw, this is not a jackass-specific issue. this is an ebuild issue. because there is nothing that we can do about an ebuild problem, it really needs to be reported via bugzilla.  |
Used fdisk for the install without issue. Prior to submitting a bug, i was just trying to find out if there are others with the same problem, specifically within the Jackass project since the version of gcc used matches the one blurp found out there about sfdisk problems. Thought it might be good to narrow things down a bit before submitting a bug. Out of curiousity, and without expecting support for the ebuild problem, did you happen to run sfdisk -l without any errors? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
todw1fd Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 21 Mar 2003 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
No others replied with problems but I believe this will affect anyone using the same CFLAGS as in the documentation for the Jackass Project. It affected all three of my x86 boxes...two p4 and one p3 xeon server. After more testing found that backing off the -O3 CFLAG to -O2 solves the problem with sfdisk. Don't know where to make those changes in the ebuild. Got the same results with 2.12i 2.12p and 2.12q ebuilds of util-linux. Hope this helps someone...must be someone else out there using sfdisk!
EDIT: Original post had wrong bug id
Here's the corrected link http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93395 which is related to the following bug...
Bugzilla Link http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79454
Last edited by todw1fd on Sat May 21, 2005 8:51 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
firefox2004 n00b

Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 9:19 am Post subject: help with glibc2.0--NPTL and matlab conflict |
|
|
Hi,
I've recently installed jackass on my pc and it really rocks. Now the problem comes with the fact that matlab licensing is not nptl compatible and according to the support from mathworks, the solution is to
| Code: | | export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5(or 2.4.1) |
I did that and then my bash stoped working and of course matlab won't start too. So I am wondering whether glibc-2.2.5 can coexist with 2.3.5 and how? Any hints/comments would be highly appreciated!
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raftysworld Apprentice


Joined: 27 Feb 2005 Posts: 236 Location: Snohomish, WA
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Via SSH, I installed athlon-xp Jackass for a friend. It worked flawlessly once again! But I did notice one minor inconsistency between that tarball and the pentium/pentium4. In the pentiums, /etc/fstab is partially updated (IE: with reiserfs as the chosen filesystem and the correct opts). This is not the case with the athlon-xp tarball. The fstab within that tarball happens to be the same that comes with the official gentoo 2005.0. Just thought I'd point this very minor issue out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 6:12 pm Post subject: Re: help with glibc2.0--NPTL and matlab conflict |
|
|
| firefox2004 wrote: | Hi,
I've recently installed jackass on my pc and it really rocks. Now the problem comes with the fact that matlab licensing is not nptl compatible and according to the support from mathworks, the solution is to
| Code: | | export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5(or 2.4.1) |
I did that and then my bash stoped working and of course matlab won't start too. So I am wondering whether glibc-2.2.5 can coexist with 2.3.5 and how? Any hints/comments would be highly appreciated!
Thanks |
It sounds like you have two issues -- NPTL compatability of your desired software package, and kernel compatability.
NPTL Compatability:
Jackass! was specifically designed with fallback support to linuxthreads for those applications that are not NPTL-compliant. I don't think that you should encounter a problem. OTOH, if you had followed the wisdom of those other guys on the Forum who insist in the use of the NPTLONLY USE flag, then you would be up the creek without a paddle.
Kernels
You can't use anything less than a 2.6 kernel with Jackass!. Anything less is unsupported.
If Jackass! isnt' the right toolkit for your critical sofware applicaiton, you may have no other choice than not to use our toolkit. Sorry. _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Raftysworld wrote: | | Via SSH, I installed athlon-xp Jackass for a friend. It worked flawlessly once again! But I did notice one minor inconsistency between that tarball and the pentium/pentium4. In the pentiums, /etc/fstab is partially updated (IE: with reiserfs as the chosen filesystem and the correct opts). This is not the case with the athlon-xp tarball. The fstab within that tarball happens to be the same that comes with the official gentoo 2005.0. Just thought I'd point this very minor issue out. |
On all of the tarballs that I built (the older arches), the /etc/fstab is partially updated. On all of the tarballs that Sith built, and the ones that I built with obsidianblackhawk (the newer arches) the /etc/fstab is the same one that comes with Gentoo 2005.0. For your reference, I've also placed copies of the Jackass! files that are not "Gentoo standard" in the /etc/jackass.examples/ folder.
personally, i built my tarballs with the /etc/fstab partially updated to reflect the /etc/fstab that is shown in the Jackass! Installation Manual and in the Stage 1/3 Guide -- which I consider to be the "hertitage" of the Jackass! Toolkit. Sith built his tarballs to be 100% Gentoo 2005.0 compliant. I've been waiting for someone to say something -- You're the first person who's noticed the difference!
There's really not a significant difference between them. Some of them are 100% Gentoo compliant, with blank placeholders for the variables that need to be changed. Some of them are partially updated to reflect the changes that need to be made to perform the installation. We didn't think that this was enough of an issue to worry about, but we should probably make them more uniform in the future.
Do you prefer one over the other? _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob P Advocate


Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 3355 Location: Jackass! Development Labs
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| todw1fd wrote: | No others replied with problems but I believe this will affect anyone using the same CFLAGS as in the documentation for the Jackass Project. It affected all three of my x86 boxes...two p4 and one p3 xeon server. After more testing found that backing off the -O3 CFLAG to -O2 solves the problem with sfdisk. Don't know where to make those changes in the ebuild. Got the same results with 2.12i 2.12p and 2.12q ebuilds of util-linux. Hope this helps someone...must be someone else out there using sfdisk!
Bugzilla Link [url] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93395[/url] |
there's a thread in portage and programming entitled "ebuilds choice and gentoo" or something like that, that covers the topic of flag-stripping.
your problem is definitely an ebuild issue and not a Jackass! issue. your only options are to
1. change -O3 to -O2 when you compile that ebuild,
2. edit the ebuild to perform flag substitution (see referenced thread)
3. file the bug report and wait for the ebuild maintainer to fix the problem.
since its not a problem related to the Jackass! toolkit itself, we should pursue any further discussion in your the other thread that you have opened on this subject. _________________ .
Stage 1/3 | Jackass! | Rockhopper! | Thanks | Google Sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
todw1fd Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 21 Mar 2003 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob P wrote:
| Quote: | | your problem is definitely an ebuild issue and not a Jackass! issue |
| Quote: | | since its not a problem related to the Jackass! toolkit itself, we should pursue any further discussion in your the other thread that you have opened on this subject. |
You are correct in these statements. And yet my problem might affect anyone else who followed the Jackass guide optimizations (at least for P3 and P4 systems) and might want to use sfdisk. My intent in posting to this thread was to find some corroboration of my issues prior to posting a bug. And logic said it might be easier to find that corroboration here since most if not all the users of the Jackass Guide would have had the same optimizations as myself.
Continued discussion in the other thread is welcomed. I've edited the prior posts to include links to the two bug reports that are related.
On a side not, I'm surprised that after all the time spent typing your replies, you didn't simply take the time to say that you either saw or didn't see the same problem on your own system(s) using the same optimizations and architecture. At least I would have know I wasn't alone. But thanks for your wisdom on the subject just the same.
Thanks for the link in portage and programming. And thanks for all the work on Jackass and Stage 1/3 which I've made much use of already and learned even more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raftysworld Apprentice


Joined: 27 Feb 2005 Posts: 236 Location: Snohomish, WA
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob P wrote: | | Do you prefer one over the other? |
It's a tough call really. There's pros and cons to both arguments. I'm not one to say, but my honest opinion would be that I prefer your method of partially updating the file. Along with the points that you made about it, I think that this tends to go along with the philosophy behind the Jackass project, which seems to be to eliminate room for simple user mistakes. The Gentoo compliance issue doesn't seem quite as important to me due to the simple fact that many parts of the installation (IE: bundling the portage snapshot with the stage3 tarball) deviate from the official guide anyway.
Just my 2 cents on the matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artificio Apprentice

Joined: 15 Sep 2004 Posts: 183
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm having some weirdness trying to compile fortran with gcc and ifc
http://forums.gentoo.org//viewtopic-t-340161.html
if I try different versions of binutils and/or comment out my make.conf, there will be fewer undefined references from gcc (iirc the min was 3), but I just can't get the linker (I believe) working...
any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gen2user n00b

Joined: 22 May 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 12:30 am Post subject: jackass livecd and LSI Megaraid(legacy) |
|
|
I currently have a 1/3 installation on a toshiba magnia 3030r server. I am changing the duties of that machine and would like to reinstall the os using Jackass! The problem is the module needed for my raid card isnt included. I worked around this before by using a 2004.3 live cd that had been created by an individual which included the necessary modules. My question is this: Can I put my modules that run the machine now (this machine is still fully functional), onto a floppy and load them after the Jackass! cd finishes booting? If so how do I accomplish this. I would prefer not to have to compile all once again especially with an unsupported version of the live cd.
BTW I have installed Jackass on my replacement web server and it runs great and was easy to install! I also use 1/3 install on my laptop and it works very well to.
Thanks in advance for any help and for an awesome installation project! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nightmorph Developer


Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1382 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| artificio wrote: | I'm having some weirdness trying to compile fortran with gcc and ifc
http://forums.gentoo.org//viewtopic-t-340161.html
if I try different versions of binutils and/or comment out my make.conf, there will be fewer undefined references from gcc (iirc the min was 3), but I just can't get the linker (I believe) working...
any ideas? |
Sorry, but this is not a Jackass!-specific problem. I did a lot of searching the forum threads as well as paying a visit to bugs.gentoo.org, but haven't found anything remotely similar. Wish I could help, but this is not Jackass!-related, and it's an odd error anyway. Have you tried just using gcc to compile fortran, and not the Intel compiler?
Edit: never mind; I see you've opened your own thread about this. That's really the proper place for this error, anyway. _________________ <UzzaDead> What is CONFIG_USB_MON?
<petteyg> A Jamaican USB configuration?
dirtyepic: "We have more cupholders."
GDP || PR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nightmorph Developer


Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1382 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 12:54 am Post subject: Re: jackass livecd and LSI Megaraid(legacy) |
|
|
| gen2user wrote: | | The problem is the module needed for my raid card isnt included. I worked around this before by using a 2004.3 live cd that had been created by an individual which included the necessary modules. My question is this: Can I put my modules that run the machine now (this machine is still fully functional), onto a floppy and load them after the Jackass! cd finishes booting? If so how do I accomplish this. |
Your question should really be directed elsewhere on the forums, as it's a unique issue, and not a problem with Jackass! itself. If the official Gentoo LiveCDs also haven't included the modules, then the Jackass! CDs also don't include them.
I'd imagine that first you'd have to compile the modules you need for the kernel on the LiveCD you'd be using; IIRC the Jackass! LiveCD uses an earlier 2.6.9 kernel...I think. You'd then have to copy it to a floppy disk, mount the disk from within Jackass!, copy the module to the appropriate directory, run "modprobe $module", cross your fingers and pray like hell.
Better yet, why not just burn the Jackass! tarball and related docs from the Jackass! CD to a CD of your own (assuming you have two CD drives) and boot using a recent Knoppix LiveCD, one with a 2.6 kernel? Though this is more of an unsupported method, it should work perfectly well, as all you have to do is copy over the tarball to the appropriate Gentoo directory from inside the Knoppix environment. I know for a fact that the Knoppix and Gnoppix (KDE and Gnome environments, respectively) LiveCDs have MegaRaid and other RAID modules; booting the Knoppix CD in "expert" mode gives the option of loading those modules, if they aren't autodetected.
Finally, don't forget about the boot options detailed here. They can be pretty handy.
HTH. _________________ <UzzaDead> What is CONFIG_USB_MON?
<petteyg> A Jamaican USB configuration?
dirtyepic: "We have more cupholders."
GDP || PR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
artificio Apprentice

Joined: 15 Sep 2004 Posts: 183
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So using Jackass! has nothing to do with my error (i.e. using GCC 3.4.3 has no effect on binutils)? Do the CFLAGS just not matter for binutils as well? I'm not trying to pester, I'm just confused as to how binutils can't be effecting by using Jackass!. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|