View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
numerodix l33t
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 743 Location: nl.eu
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
so.. uhm... those of you who say v7 is fast, faster than v5.. what exactly did you do? _________________ undvd - ripping dvds should be as simple as unzip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
runlevel0 n00b
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 67 Location: Mountains of Noord-Holland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
numerodix wrote: | so.. uhm... those of you who say v7 is fast, faster than v5.. what exactly did you do? :D |
Put it on a faster computer?
It's _damn_ slow, at least the Linux beta. I can't talk about the native win implementation, I would first need a Win box to see it running ;) _________________ --
]:O <-[Mooooooooooo!] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PowerFactor Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 1693 Location: out of it
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I never tried the beta but 7.0 isn't what I'd call _damn_slow. Takes about 2s to load, which is slightly longer then acroread5 and significantly longer than xpdf. Once it's up and running it seems somewhere between acroread5 and xpdf in responsiveness. Closer to xpdf than acroread5 though.
The windows version seems to start slightly faster, can't tell any difference once it's loaded though. And it's a heck of a lot faster in every way than version 6. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jazz Guru
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 543 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Umm i get this error when i try to start acroread.. anyideas ???
/opt/Acrobat7/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
BYe,
Jazz _________________ In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tc n00b
Joined: 16 Aug 2002 Posts: 59
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BlackEdder Advocate
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 2588 Location: Dutch enclave in Egham, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
+ and - are still not bound to zoom in and zoom out, but then again neither has xpdf that. I just don't trust apps that miss something so obvious.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
30726 Veteran
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 Posts: 1501
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jazz wrote: | Umm i get this error when i try to start acroread.. anyideas ???
/opt/Acrobat7/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
BYe,
Jazz |
Do you have GTK2 installed?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BlackEdder Advocate
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 2588 Location: Dutch enclave in Egham, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | A new Linux version of Adobe Systems' Reader software for viewing Portable Document Format, or PDF, files is available on the company's FTP download site--but it's not the final product, spokeswoman Rebecca Michals said late Tuesday. Instead, the software is a prerelease version made available to help people in the Netherlands meet tax deadlines, she said. |
Yeee for us Dutchies eh
I do not understand though. Last year I called them that they should make the electronic tax program also available for linux and they said they actually had at least a working mac version in house, but weren't allowed to provide it to users. They only supported the windows version. And now the goverment/or users apparently got adobe to prerelease their reader |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ozbird Apprentice
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
numerodix wrote: | PowerFactor wrote: | But otherwise so far it looks like the first acroread for linux that's truely on par with the windows version. |
Agreed, it's just as slow to start. |
But twice as slow to download... 40MB?! ILINXR.TAR inside the tarball is 90MB!! Seems way over the top for a PDF viewer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
numerodix l33t
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 743 Location: nl.eu
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ozbird wrote: | numerodix wrote: | PowerFactor wrote: | But otherwise so far it looks like the first acroread for linux that's truely on par with the windows version. |
Agreed, it's just as slow to start. |
But twice as slow to download... 40MB?! ILINXR.TAR inside the tarball is 90MB!! Seems way over the top for a PDF viewer. |
It has everything you will ever want from a pdf viewer and more. _________________ undvd - ripping dvds should be as simple as unzip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PowerFactor Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 1693 Location: out of it
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ozbird wrote: | But twice as slow to download... 40MB?! ILINXR.TAR inside the tarball is 90MB!! |
Yeah, the windows exe installer must be compressed a lot better or something. It's still 90MB+ once installed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
codergeek42 Bodhisattva
Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[post troll="possibly"]
numerodix wrote: | It has everything you will ever want from a pdf viewer and more. | It's not free. Therefore it does _not_ have everything I want from a PDF viewer. gpdf rocks though...
[/post] _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
allucid Veteran
Joined: 02 Nov 2002 Posts: 1314 Location: atlanta
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is the "standard" PDF viewer, though. It's nice when pdf files look the same on every platform. Gpdf/xpdf don't always display all the information in a pdf file correctly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D-M Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
numerodix wrote: | so.. uhm... those of you who say v7 is fast, faster than v5.. what exactly did you do? |
Just installed it. I know that is a pretty useless answer, and most likely not what you wanted to hear but that is all I did. I find v5 and 7 on my PC to be about the same speed launching, which is about 2 seconds. More then acceptable, particularly since my PC isn't a speed demon.
So far my personal experience with Adobe Reader 7 has been very good, considering the very limited amount of time I have used it, about 15 min. Not knowing it was available in portage I just downloaded from adobe and used their install script and other then the PPKLite.api error so far so good. Scroll mouse works, opens a 1600+ page pdf quickly, and search seems to work speedily as well. I haven't tried setting it up as a plug in for firefox yet but thanks to this thread should there be any issues there are some possible solutions already.
The only advice I can give to anyone having issues is just keep in mind this is beta software, do your best to document what is happening and pass it on in a bug report.
DM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pink Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm, looks nicer but I have gone back to 5 for the moment.
Far, far, FAR slower than 5 in all aspects of use inlcuding opening, viewing, rendering and closing.
I cannot get the plugin to work for the life of me.
I don't really mind as it is a beta version and will try again when it is finalised but apart from the looks (which were much better) it fails miserably on all counts here. Looking forward to the next release, I can see the potential |
|
Back to top |
|
|
numerodix l33t
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 743 Location: nl.eu
|
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
codergeek42 wrote: | [post troll="possibly"]
numerodix wrote: | It has everything you will ever want from a pdf viewer and more. | It's not free. Therefore it does _not_ have everything I want from a PDF viewer. gpdf rocks though...
[/post] |
Okay, maybe not _everything_ but it does render pdf's, that's pretty good for just 90mb, don't be so friggin demanding _________________ undvd - ripping dvds should be as simple as unzip |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WhimpyPeon Apprentice
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 158 Location: Columbus, Nebraska
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Version 7.0 rocks! It used to take forever to launch the program and load a pdf. Now it is less than two seconds on a 2100 Athlon, 512 ram. The new look is also much more clean.
I didn't have any problems emerging the program. I run unstable, but it worked out of the box (except the plugin for firefox, but I would rather load externally anyways).
Mouse scroll works too! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rhill Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 1629 Location: sk.ca
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
add me to the under 2s group. this thing flies. a 5mb O'Reilly ebook takes ~5s. it's much faster than xpdf for me. i usually have to click next and sit for 5s or so for it to render the next page. with this, it's instant. i'm on a P3-500.
there's been a few fixes made to the ebuild, so maybe re-emerging will help. _________________ by design, by neglect
for a fact or just for effect |
|
Back to top |
|
|
runlevel0 n00b
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 Posts: 67 Location: Mountains of Noord-Holland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
WhimpyPeon wrote: | I didn't have any problems emerging the program. |
Sorry, I missed that point... Emerging? Do you mean it's in portage right now? _________________ --
]:O <-[Mooooooooooo!] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
radfoj Guru
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 490 Location: Tísek, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
runlevel0 wrote: | WhimpyPeon wrote: | I didn't have any problems emerging the program. |
Sorry, I missed that point... Emerging? Do you mean it's in portage right now? |
Really, you have to # emerge sync
and add "app-text/acroread ~x86" to /etc/portage/package.keywords
then
# emerge -av acroread
should be emerged |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bmfan n00b
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PPKLite.api Failed to Load
PPKLite requires the OpenLDAP package to be installed on the system,
and fails to initialize in its absence. If you get this error when acroread
starts up, you will need to install the LDAP libraries (OpenLDAP package).
If PPKLite still fails to load, make a link to the installed libldap.so.X and
liblber.so.X in /Reader/intellinux/lib with the names
'libldap.so' and 'liblber.so'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjv Guru
Joined: 02 Jul 2003 Posts: 353 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BlackEdder wrote: | Quote: | A new Linux version of Adobe Systems' Reader software for viewing Portable Document Format, or PDF, files is available on the company's FTP download site--but it's not the final product, spokeswoman Rebecca Michals said late Tuesday. Instead, the software is a prerelease version made available to help people in the Netherlands meet tax deadlines, she said. |
Yeee for us Dutchies eh
I do not understand though. Last year I called them that they should make the electronic tax program also available for linux and they said they actually had at least a working mac version in house, but weren't allowed to provide it to users. They only supported the windows version. And now the goverment/or users apparently got adobe to prerelease their reader |
lol
Eh, and for the Belgians? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jannis Guru
Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 340 Location: Germany / Bavaria / Aschaffenburg
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as my experience has come:
Acroread7 works and even the firefox-plugin works flawlessly. It's pretty fast (I can't compare to acroread5 as I never had it). I can't complain.
I had ldap in my use flag and my GTK+ version is: 2.6.4 (newest I think) so don't complain about bleeding-edge-users ^^. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjv Guru
Joined: 02 Jul 2003 Posts: 353 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, seriously, it's really nice. Much much better, more stable and faster than the previous version. Lot's of new options.
The only thing I miss though is an option to print 2 pages on 1 (or 4 on 1). Anybody knows how I get this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BlackEdder Advocate
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 Posts: 2588 Location: Dutch enclave in Egham, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pjv wrote: | No, seriously, it's really nice. Much much better, more stable and faster than the previous version. Lot's of new options.
The only thing I miss though is an option to print 2 pages on 1 (or 4 on 1). Anybody knows how I get this? | I wrote a small script to do this, but basically Code: | lpr -o number-up=2 some.pdf |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|