| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
quat
Guru
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 316
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 3:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| nelchael wrote: | | DRM w 2.6.x jest OK. w 2.4.x jest starawe (AFAIR) |
kernel gentoo-dev-sources a wyskakuje
| Code: |
spoof@solid07 # dmesg | grep drm
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500]
spoof@solid07 #
|
nie za stare ?
_________________
a mind is like a parachute, it's better when it's open
Last edited by quat on Sat Sep 18, 2004 4:19 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelchael
Retired Dev
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 1948
Location: /dev/drzewo
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | nelchael@nelchael ~$ dmesg | grep drm
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY
nelchael@nelchael ~$ |
Nie 
DRM dla radeonow sie nie zmienia, bo stare karty sa juz nierozwijane, a dla nowych sa sterowniki ATI.
_________________
[color=gray:17697d0166]http://dev.gentoo.org/~nelchael/[/color:17697d0166]
[size=14:17697d0166]>> [b:17697d0166]Zasady na f.g.o->Polish[/b:17697d0166] <<[/size:17697d0166] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cichy
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
GeForce 4 MX 440 SE DDR 64-bit (250/380)
AthlonXP 1700+ (11x136)
256MB @DDR266 CL2
Gigabyte GA-7VA (KT400)
Rozdzielczość 1088x816x24 83Hz:
| Code: |
bash-2.05b$ glxgears
5412 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1082.400 FPS
6172 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1234.400 FPS
6197 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1239.400 FPS
6179 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1235.800 FPS
6185 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1237.000 FPS
6180 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1236.000 FPS
bash-2.05b$
|
Teraz może trochę bardziej wiarygodne testy:
Quake1 (Tenebrae 1.04)
Rozdzielczość 640x480x32 130Hz
Wielkość ekranu taka, aby był widoczny cały panel
Wyniki timedemo:
demo1 - 14,0 fps
demo2 - 18,3 fps
demo3 - 11,8 fps
Wyniki marne  . Da się grać dopiero po wyłączeniu cieni.
Ma ktoś może Radeona 9600 i mógłby podac swoje wyniki ? Bo miałem plany kupić taką właśnie kartę, ale opinie o działaniu Radeonów pod linuxem są dość zniechęcające . I chyba narazie sobie poczekam...
Pozdrawiam.
_________________
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cichy
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| joker wrote: | | a jest mozliwosc podkrecania zegarow karty pod linuxem ? |
Zainstaluj sobie nvclock.
Pozdrawiam.
_________________
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeonHVM
n00b
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 2
Location: Lillehammer or Molde - Norway
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
AMD Barton 3200+
512MB PC3200 CL2 RAM
Nvidia GeForce 6800GT 256MB
| Code: | 81372 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16274.400 FPS
81363 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16272.600 FPS
81341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16268.200 FPS
81379 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16275.800 FPS
81122 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16224.400 FPS
81061 frames in 5.0 seconds = 16212.200 FPS
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ja mam ATI Radeon 9550 i ledwo 1150 fps
Zainstalowany mam fglrx
Czy ktoś wie dlaczego?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zwierzak
Veteran
Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1012
Location: /dev/null
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| po pierwsze w jajko agpgrep po drugie jezeli masz xorg w wersji 6.8.0 stery binarne ATI nie uzyskuja akceleracji sprzetowej |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
qdlacz
n00b
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 63
Location: Poland Białystok
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
może kogoś zainteresuje
7784 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1556.800 FPS
9630 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1926.000 FPS
9624 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1924.800 FPS
9635 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1927.000 FPS
9632 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1926.400 FPS
9637 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1927.400 FPS
9633 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1926.600 FPS
9629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1925.800 FPS
9626 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1925.200 FPS
Abit IS7-E2 2x 256 MB RAM Elixir DDR
Celeron D 2.4 GHz
Radeon 9100 64 MB RAM 128 bit
Pozdrawiam |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zwierzak wrote: | | po pierwsze w jajko agpgrep po drugie jezeli masz xorg w wersji 6.8.0 stery binarne ATI nie uzyskuja akceleracji sprzetowej |
Nie mam czegoś takiego jak AGPGREP a chyba chodziło Ci o AGPGART
bash-2.05b$ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep AGP
CONFIG_AGP=y
# CONFIG_AGP_ALI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_ATI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD64 is not set
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL_MCH=y
# CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_EFFICEON is not set
Natomiast X'y mam 6.7.0-r2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rzezioo
Apprentice
Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 260
Location: Szczecin, Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
mam pentium4 2,4Ghz i gf mx 440
6169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1233.800 FPS
6383 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1276.600 FPS
6416 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1283.200 FPS
6258 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1251.600 FPS
6751 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1350.200 FPS
6734 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1346.800 FPS
6789 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1357.800 FPS
6763 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1352.600 FPS
6845 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1369.000 FPS
6616 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1323.200 FPS
to chyba cos slabo no nie?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cichy
Apprentice
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 217
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rzezioo wrote: | mam pentium4 2,4Ghz i gf mx 440
6616 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1323.200 FPS
to chyba cos slabo no nie?? |
Jesli masz karte z 64-bitowa szyna pamieci to wyniki sa w normie.
Pozdrawiam
_________________
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
C1REX
l33t
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 617
Location: London
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mam mały problem.
| Code: | C1REX linux # cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status: Disabled
AGP initialization failed, please check the ouput
of the 'dmesg' command and/or your system log file
for additional information on this problem. |
| Code: | C1REX linux # dmesg
...
Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected VIA KT266/KY266x/KT333 chipset
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe8000000
...
NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 NVIDIA Kernel Module 1.0-6629 Wed Nov 3 13:12:51 PST 2004
NVRM: not using NVAGP, AGPGART is loaded!!
NVRM: not using NVAGP, AGPGART is loaded! |
Wyniki w teście na Duron800 i 5200FX to lekko ponad 1000.
_________________
I'm sorry for language mistakes. My native language is polish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martin.k
Guru
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 492
Location: Wylatowo, Polska
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cpu: AMD Athlon-xp 1600+
mobo: MIS K7-Turbo2 VIA KT133A
gfx: Gaiward GF3 PP! Ti/500 TV Jumbo GS
mem: 768 SDRAM PC133
driver: nvidia-1.0-6111
X: xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1 @ 1024x768x16
10249 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2049.800 FPS
12600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2520.000 FPS
12278 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2455.600 FPS
12288 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2457.600 FPS
12855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2571.000 FPS
12832 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2566.400 FPS
12821 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2564.200 FPS
12843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2568.600 FPS
12773 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2554.600 FPS
12466 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2493.200 FPS
I śmiech na sali  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martin.k
Guru
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 492
Location: Wylatowo, Polska
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| C1REX wrote: | Mam mały problem.
| Code: | C1REX linux # cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status: Disabled
AGP initialization failed, please check the ouput
of the 'dmesg' command and/or your system log file
for additional information on this problem. |
| Code: | C1REX linux # dmesg
...
Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Detected VIA KT266/KY266x/KT333 chipset
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe8000000
...
NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 NVIDIA Kernel Module 1.0-6629 Wed Nov 3 13:12:51 PST 2004
NVRM: not using NVAGP, AGPGART is loaded!!
NVRM: not using NVAGP, AGPGART is loaded! |
Wyniki w teście na Duron800 i 5200FX to lekko ponad 1000. |
Twój problem może być w tym, że masz wkompilowaną obsługę AGP w kernel a nie jako moduł. Jeśli tak jest to kernel przy uruchomieniu przejmuje obsługę AGP i za nic w świecie nie załadujesz modułu nvidii do obsługi AGP.
Sprawdź swój .config i w razie potrzeby przekompiluj jajo. A jeśli masz AGP jako moduł i jest wyjątkowo wredny i nie daje sie wywalić nvidii, to spróbuj ręcznie go ciąć: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
C1REX
l33t
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 617
Location: London
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wielkie dzięki : )
Właśnie wywaliłem całkowicie z jajka obsługę agp dla mojej płyty i wynik trochę podskoczył.
Duron800, FX5200
| Code: | 5842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1168.400 FPS
6343 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1268.600 FPS
6349 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1269.800 FPS
6351 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1270.200 FPS
6350 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1270.000 FPS
6347 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1269.400 FPS
6350 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1270.000 FPS
6350 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1270.000 FPS
6350 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1270.000 FPS |
| Code: | c1rex@C1REX ~ $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/host-bridge
Host Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333]
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates: 4x 2x 1x
Registers: 0x1f000217:0x00000314 |
| Code: | c1rex@C1REX ~ $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status: Enabled
Driver: NVIDIA
AGP Rate: 4x
Fast Writes: Enabled
SBA: Enabled
|
BTW: Na GeForce2Ti, Q3 chodził przynajmniej tak szybko, jak na tej karcie.
Szkoda, że oddałem swoją starą kartę i nie mogę porównać wyników testów.
_________________
I'm sorry for language mistakes. My native language is polish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gogiel
Guru
Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 347
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
AMD 2600+, 256 MB 333, MSI GF 5900 XT
| Code: | gogiel@gogiel gogiel $ glxgears
31288 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6257.600 FPS
32276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6455.200 FPS
32528 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6505.600 FPS
32571 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6514.200 FPS
32550 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6510.000 FPS
|
Czy komus udalo sie odpalic nvclock na podobnej karcie? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fallow
Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2206
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a ja wrocilem do agpgart gdyz miewalem problemy na agp nvidii z 6629 i niektorymi wersjami kernela. agpgart juz nie jest wcale takie zle
wyniki glxgears pomiedzy agpgart a nvagp (FW,SBA) to +- 30klatek.
cheers.
_________________
"Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zwierzak
Veteran
Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 1012
Location: /dev/null
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tswiercz wrote: | | Zwierzak wrote: | | po pierwsze w jajko agpgrep po drugie jezeli masz xorg w wersji 6.8.0 stery binarne ATI nie uzyskuja akceleracji sprzetowej |
Nie mam czegoś takiego jak AGPGREP a chyba chodziło Ci o AGPGART
bash-2.05b$ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep AGP
CONFIG_AGP=y
# CONFIG_AGP_ALI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_ATI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD64 is not set
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL_MCH=y
# CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_EFFICEON is not set
Natomiast X'y mam 6.7.0-r2 |
A jaką masz płyte główna? Ja do niedawno zaznaczałem Intela i akceleracja była kiepskawa, dopiero po jakims czasie wertowalem istrukcje płyty głównej i doczytałem się że mam ViA, tobie też to radze sprawdzić.
PS moje wyniki są takie (bywały lepsze ale mialem mniej zaladowany komp), a pozatym za niedlugo sie polepsza bo 17 wychodza nowe stery ATI
| Code: | 6479 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1295.800 FPS
6500 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1300.000 FPS
6507 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1301.400 FPS
6531 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1306.200 FPS
6486 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1297.200 FPS
6549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1309.800 FPS
6527 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.400 FPS
6516 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1303.200 FPS
6525 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.000 FPS |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawid159
Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 414
Location: /dev/Kłodzko
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 2905 frames in 5.0 seconds = 581.000 FPS
3718 frames in 5.0 seconds = 743.600 FPS
3712 frames in 5.0 seconds = 742.400 FPS
3681 frames in 5.0 seconds = 736.200 FPS
3715 frames in 5.0 seconds = 743.000 FPS
3711 frames in 5.0 seconds = 742.200 FPS
3715 frames in 5.0 seconds = 743.000 FPS
3715 frames in 5.0 seconds = 743.000 FPS
3716 frames in 5.0 seconds = 743.200 FPS
3550 frames in 5.0 seconds = 710.000 FPS
|
Athlon 2000+, 512 RAM, GF MX420 64DDR, MSI K7N2(nforce2) Wyniki przerażająco niskie Postanowiłem w końcu się za to zabrać A więc sytuacja wygląda tak :
| Code: |
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/host-bridge
Host Bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different version?)
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates: 4x 2x 1x
Registers: 0x1f000217:0x00000001
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/card
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Not Supported
AGP Rates: 4x 2x 1x
Registers: 0x1f000017:0x00000000
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status: Enabled
Driver: AGPGART
AGP Rate: 4x
Fast Writes: Disabled
SBA: Disabled
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/cards/0
Model: GeForce4 MX 420
IRQ: 5
Video BIOS: 04.17.00.45.91
Card Type: AGP
cat /etc/modules.d/nvidia
options nvidia NVreg_EnableAGPSBA=1 NVreg_EnableAGPFW=1
xorg.conf
Section "Device"
Identifier "NVIDIA"
VendorName "nvidia"
Driver "nvidia"
BusID "PCI:02:00:0"
VideoRam 65536
Option "NvAGP" "3"
Option "AGPMode" "4"
Option "AGPFastWrite" "true"
Option "EnablePageFlip" "true"
Option "DigitalVibrance" "2"
# Insert Clocks lines here if appropriate
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "dbe"
SubSection "extmod"
Option "omit xfree86-dga"
EndSubSection
Load "extmod"
Load "type1"
Load "speedo"
Load "freetype"
Load "glx"
# Load "dri"
EndSection
|
Jakieś sugestie co do tego  Jak coś jeszcze podać to powiedzcie co
Edit: Zapomniałem o 2 rzeczach
| Code: | [ebuild R ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r1 0 kB
[ebuild R ] media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.6629-r1 -multilib 0 kB
|
| Code: | glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
server glx version string: 1.3
server glx extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig,
GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control
client glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
client glx version string: 1.3
client glx extensions:
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info,
GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_SGI_video_sync,
GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_NV_video_out, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer,
GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_NV_float_buffer
GLX extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig,
GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control,
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 MX 420/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
OpenGL version string: 1.5.2 NVIDIA 66.29
OpenGL extensions:
GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_point_parameters,
GL_ARB_point_sprite, GL_ARB_shader_objects, GL_ARB_shading_language_100,
GL_ARB_texture_compression, GL_ARB_texture_cube_map,
GL_ARB_texture_env_add, GL_ARB_texture_env_combine,
GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3, GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat,
GL_ARB_texture_rectangle, GL_ARB_transpose_matrix,
GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object, GL_ARB_vertex_program, GL_ARB_vertex_shader,
GL_ARB_window_pos, GL_S3_s3tc, GL_EXT_texture_env_add, GL_EXT_abgr,
GL_EXT_bgra, GL_EXT_blend_color, GL_EXT_blend_minmax,
GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint,
GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array, GL_EXT_Cg_shader,
GL_EXT_draw_range_elements, GL_EXT_fog_coord, GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays,
GL_EXT_packed_pixels, GL_EXT_paletted_texture, GL_EXT_pixel_buffer_object,
GL_EXT_point_parameters, GL_EXT_rescale_normal, GL_EXT_secondary_color,
GL_EXT_separate_specular_color, GL_EXT_shared_texture_palette,
GL_EXT_stencil_wrap, GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc,
GL_EXT_texture_cube_map, GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp,
GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3,
GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic, GL_EXT_texture_lod,
GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias, GL_EXT_texture_object, GL_EXT_vertex_array,
GL_IBM_rasterpos_clip, GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat,
GL_KTX_buffer_region, GL_NV_blend_square, GL_NV_fence,
GL_NV_fog_distance, GL_NV_light_max_exponent, GL_NV_packed_depth_stencil,
GL_NV_pixel_data_range, GL_NV_point_sprite, GL_NV_register_combiners,
GL_NV_texgen_reflection, GL_NV_texture_env_combine4,
GL_NV_texture_rectangle, GL_NV_vertex_array_range,
GL_NV_vertex_array_range2, GL_NV_vertex_program, GL_NV_vertex_program1_1,
GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap, GL_SGIS_multitexture, GL_SGIS_texture_lod,
GL_SUN_slice_accum
glu version: 1.3
glu extensions:
GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0x21 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x22 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x23 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x24 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 0 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x25 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x26 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x27 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x28 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 0 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x29 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2a 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2b 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2c 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 0 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2d 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2e 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x2f 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 0 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x30 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 4 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x31 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x32 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x33 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 0 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x34 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 4 16 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x35 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x36 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x37 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 0 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
0x38 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 4 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 0 None
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Możę nie oto Ci chodzilo, ale nie sadze abys mogl miec wyzsze wyniki na tej karcie, pewnie jest jeszcze 64-bitowa. Choc moge sie mylic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawid159
Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 414
Location: /dev/Kłodzko
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Możliwe, że nie da się osiągnąć lepszych wyników zaciekawiło mnie to | CyriC wrote: | Kod:
8318 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1663.600 FPS
8669 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1733.800 FPS
8688 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1737.600 FPS
8730 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1746.000 FPS
8778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1755.600 FPS
8766 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1753.200 FPS
8813 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1762.600 FPS
8775 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1755.000 FPS
8683 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1736.600 FPS
8769 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1753.800 FPS
8732 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1746.400 FPS
8731 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1746.200 FPS
8711 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1742.200 FPS
8715 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1743.000 FPS
Duron 1.3, GForce 4MX440 DDR 64mB |
Karta o model gorsza ale za to procesor szybszy to wydaje mi się, że ponad 1000FPS powinno być spokojnie |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joker
l33t
Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 681
Location: www
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zainstalowalem nowe sterowniki ati i powiem ze slabo jest
na 9550 wyniki glxgears:
| Code: | 4822 frames in 5.0 seconds = 964.400 FPS
5189 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1037.800 FPS
4928 frames in 5.0 seconds = 985.600 FPS
5186 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1037.200 FPS
4931 frames in 5.0 seconds = 986.200 FPS
5190 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1038.000 FPS |
i co jakis czas koleczka sie zatrzymoja na ulamek sekundy.
_________________
http://amarok.org.pl | http://koffice.org.pl | http://kde.org.pl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Na stronie ATi pojawiły się niedawno pliczki:
bardzo dluuuuugi URL
I teraz mam pytanie. Czy jest jakaś możliwość zainstalowania tego rpm'a X.Org?? I czy te sterowniki wykorzystują sprzętową akceleracje?
Po drugie jak zrobie emerge -s ati-drivers on wypisuje mi jakieś wersje 3.14.1 a tu już 8.8.25. Jak to jest?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joker
l33t
Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 681
Location: www
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Być może ta karta jest taka słaba, bo w sumie na normalnych ustawieniach ma tylko 7000 marków w 3d01, natomiast jak gram, to kręce do bólu. Ale znowu śednio mi się chce wierzyć, że zdobywa ona tyle co GF 440 mx 64-bity, tj ok 1200 fps, przecież ta karta ma około 4000 pkt w 3d01. No ale zobaczymy, na razie robie emerge sync a potem zobaczymy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Polskie forum (Polish) 
