| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sibn
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 36
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2002 3:53 pm Post subject: Uplink 1.3 patch: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 not found |
 |
|
Unfortunately, i have been unable to locate the package that provides this version of this library, even back as far as the beta testing cycle for this patch. My debian system seems to have it, provided by libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2. I can copy the binary library from my debian install, and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to make the game work, but (obviously) i'd rather not have to do all that. I'd rather find out why I do not have libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. Any ideas?
Edit: oh, and if it's relevant, i'm using what i believe was the 1.4 base, compiled wholly with gcc 3.2.
_________________
Hey um, this is my signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beforegod
Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 1494
Location: Frankfurt/Main
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2002 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Youre right..
it was compiled with gcc 3.x but it can help to make a symbolic link like this
| Code: |
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-6.1-1.so.2 /usr/lib/libstdc++-6.2-2.so.3
|
A dirty solution but it should work! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sibn
n00b
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 36
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2002 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Beforegod wrote: | Youre right..
it was compiled with gcc 3.x but it can help to make a symbolic link like this
| Code: |
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-6.1-1.so.2 /usr/lib/libstdc++-6.2-2.so.3
|
A dirty solution but it should work! |
It does work, but I was hoping there was a more "correct" way to do it; debian (sid, anyway) has the correct version of this library, built-in. Oh, well. Thanks, anyway. 
_________________
Hey um, this is my signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zORN
n00b
Joined: 26 Aug 2002
Posts: 55
Location: Bei Wolfsburg:)
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thx 4 this "dirty" solution... anyway.. i can play uplink on my gentoo box now... thats ok!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slik
n00b
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 48
Location: Alberta, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Beforegod wrote: | Youre right..
it was compiled with gcc 3.x but it can help to make a symbolic link like this
| Code: |
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-6.1-1.so.2 /usr/lib/libstdc++-6.2-2.so.3
|
A dirty solution but it should work! |
Um, I don't have this file, I used a stage3 tarball of 1.4_rc1 I believe.. I'm kinda stuck... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NU-Slacker
n00b
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 69
Location: Northwestern University
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2002 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just look for a file that has a similar version number of the second argument. That should work out just fine for you.... sure its a kludgy solution, but the cause of the problem is also a stupid one. Stupid problems call for stupid solutions at times.
_________________
"There are 10 types of people: those that understand binary and those who dont." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Gamers & Players
